- From: Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2015 17:22:24 +0100
- To: Christopher Allan Webber <cwebber@dustycloud.org>
- Cc: Shane Hudson <Shane@shanehudson.net>, Social Web Working Group <public-socialweb@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAKaEYhJr5ffckvSKteccCPhpGe1o5-6DaAUyoYVu9bSNusXjVQ@mail.gmail.com>
On 4 November 2015 at 15:26, Christopher Allan Webber < cwebber@dustycloud.org> wrote: > Melvin Carvalho writes: > > > On 3 November 2015 at 22:42, Shane Hudson <Shane@shanehudson.net> wrote: > > > >> Sure, but it puts a lot of people off. In the same way the old HTML > >> doctype was scary, despite it actually not being required to understand > it. > >> > > > > Appreciate the point of view, and largely agree. Personally a big > believe > > in simplicity driving adoption. > > > > However, everyone's will have an opinion on what form that will take, and > > often feel it strongly. The web is so big, that there's something about > > almost every technology that puts *a lot* of people off. Just as in > sport > > there's something about almost every football team that puts *a lot* of > > people off. Many people are put off JSON LD, or LD in general, because > > they have never tried it. I say that because, I was in this camp for a > > LONG time, but when I actually used it, I found it remarkably easy. A > lot > > easier than its reputation for complexity. > > > > IMHO, it's can be more constructive to talk about technical barriers, > > implementation feedback on this that have been tried, and actual feedback > > from adopters. As such I've tried to document adopters of JSON LD on > this > > wiki page: > > > > > https://www.w3.org/wiki/Socialwg/Media_type_for_AS2#Iterop_Considerations_-_application.2Fld.2Bjson > > > > I think it's valuable to share insights on what developers will and wont > > like, but let's appreciate that there are lots of unknowns, as AS2 hasnt > > been tried out yet by many people. If there's a significant deployment > > that has good technical feedback or objections that's going to be > valuable, > > let's try and document specific pain points. > > BTW Melvin, my goal here in ActiviPy is to provide an entry into using > ActivityStreams (technically it can do other vocabularies too, which > may be better promoted in the future) while keeping it easy for those > to whom linked data may be foreign initially. However, there's an > explicit goal towards encouraging exploration of linked data. You can > see this in the documentation here: > > > http://activipy.readthedocs.org/en/latest/tutorial.html#expanding-our-vocabulary > > In other words, I think the "compact json-ld representation" is a great > gateway drug into encouraging people to explore linked data type tools. > There's definitely a goal of encouraging people to notice that doorknob > so they can turn it and explore when ready, but also helping people > become comfortable immediately with an environment which looks like that > which they already know. > > So even though ActiviPy doesn't start with introducing a straight-up > linked data approach, I think the approach it does take is a nice method > by which we might see people exploring that space more! > Totally agree! Tho I think once people start to see linked data in use, it will exceed expectations. That's definitely been my experience! :) > > - Chris >
Received on Wednesday, 4 November 2015 16:22:56 UTC