Re: jf2 vs. AS 2.0

Harry Halpin <hhalpin@w3.org> wrote on 11/04/2015 04:35:59 AM:

> From: Harry Halpin <hhalpin@w3.org>
> To: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
> Cc: Aaron Parecki <aaron@parecki.com>, "public-socialweb@w3.org" 
> <public-socialweb@w3.org>
> Date: 11/04/2015 04:35 AM
> Subject: Re: jf2 vs. AS 2.0
> 
> 

> On 11/03/2015 10:24 PM, Melvin Carvalho wrote:
> 
> > On 4 November 2015 at 01:51, James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 4:46 PM, Aaron Parecki <aaron@parecki.com> 
wrote:
> > > Thanks for looking over this, but please don't make assumptions 
about what
> > > the purpose of jf2 is. I tried adding it to the agenda for 
today'scall, but
> > > it was continually pushed down in the list to make room for all the 
AS2
> > > issues and we didn't get to talk about it at all.
> > >
> > 
> > Fair enough. I'm responding to what I've already been told about it's
> > purpose. Harry indicated previously that it was intended as an
> > alternative to AS 2.0 and, from what I understand, there's been some
> > discussion/disagreement among the chairs about considering it as an
> > alternative to AS2 that ought to be considered a parallel work item of
> > the working group. My analysis is based on that information. If you
> > (as the author) have a different point of view on it, then fantastic,
> > and I certainly hope you take no offense to the analysis.
> 
> Not I did not say that it meant as an 'alternative',

This is what you wrote:

Harry Halpin <hhalpin@w3.org> wrote on 10/26/2015 08:12:54 PM:

> ... we have an *alternative* syntax to AS2.0 being 
> developed in the WG:
> 
> https://github.com/w3c-social/Social-Syntax-Brainstorming/wiki/
> Minimal-Activity-Stream
> 
> ...

But I'm happy that Aaron as a constructive point of view and he should 
feel free to keep on working on his document if it helps the IndieWebCamp 
folks understand how to leverage AS 2.0.
--
Arnaud  Le Hors - Senior Technical Staff Member, Open Web Technologies - 
IBM Software Group