- From: Robert Sanderson <azaroth42@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2015 22:18:04 -0800
- To: "public-socialweb@w3.org" <public-socialweb@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CABevsUF76_BH12AjYVzW-+VUne01vWusiGgDz1xeGjpSecp_0A@mail.gmail.com>
Apologies for the likely newbie question, which is likely the first of many. Please bear with me, and hopefully they can be treated as a input from someone without all of the background knowledge you all have ... like most readers will be :) The `content` of an Object is "A natural language description of the object content.". But not the content of the resource itself? Traditionally one would call the property "description" rather than "content"? Which is not to start a naming discussion, just to make sure that `description` is the operative word, not `content` :) So this: { "@context": "http://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams", "@type": "Image", "displayName": "Small Red Square", "content": "<p>This image is a small red square, for unknown use.</p>", "height": 100, "width": 100} Could be a 100x100 image, and `content` would describe the image, and displayName give a label for it. (As per the example in the attachment definition) So ... if you have a Note or Article without a URI, is there a way to provide the actual representation of the resource, rather than a description of that (err) content? Example 135 / Fig 37 in -core, however, gives the impression that the representation is in the content field? Could someone please show how to model this situation in AS: The Object is a Note with the uri http://example.org/note1.md. It's in Markdown and the note's representation is "You __won't believe__ what happens at the end of [this video](youtube)!". The description of that content is the HTML: "<span>Clickbait in Markdown</span>". Thanks! Rob -- Rob Sanderson Information Standards Advocate Digital Library Systems and Services Stanford, CA 94305
Received on Wednesday, 4 November 2015 06:18:33 UTC