Re: AS 2.0 pump-like spec

On 03/31/2015 04:23 PM, Harry Halpin wrote:
> 
> 
> On 03/31/2015 11:50 AM, ☮ elf Pavlik ☮ wrote:
>> On 03/31/2015 10:52 AM, Jessica Tallon wrote:
>>> Hey,
>>>
>>> I've decided to fork Owen Shepherd's activitypump with the aim
>>> of starting work on a spec that we could propose as the pump-like
>>> AS 2.0 candidate. I'll be trying to start trying to:
>>>
>>> - Update it to track any changes to AS 2.0 draft thus far. - Look
>>> through the user stories and find where the activitypump spec is
>>> lacking. - Add support and refine to be suitable.
>>>
>>> I'd love help off those who are interested in helping create a 
>>> pump-like AS 2.0 draft, I will be mainly working with issues on 
>>> the Github issue tracker, if you'd like commit access let me
>>> know I'd be happy to give it to people in the WG.
>> awesome!
> 
>> your repo doesn't have issues activated 
>> https://github.com/xray7224/activitypump
> 
>> one of my comments to thread started by Owen * 
>> https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-socialweb/2014Nov/0056.htm
> l
> 
> 
> 
> 
> just as a reminder, i created this orga on github which we can
>> also use to share access: https://github.com/w3c-social
> 
> Elf,
> 
> While your enthusiasm is always amazing, notice that W3C has its own
> Git repo for the rest of the Working Groups.
> 
> https://github.com/w3c
> 
> Shall we just use this to simplify things?
> 
> The main advantage is other WGs notice we exist more easily in terms
> of the Open Web Platform.
We can transfer repos at any time! Can someone managing this orga create
Social WG and Social IG teams with all the participants? Then we can
move there easily...