- From: ☮ elf Pavlik ☮ <perpetual-tripper@wwelves.org>
- Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2015 16:19:50 +0200
- To: public-socialweb@w3.org
- Message-ID: <55180A06.300@wwelves.org>
On 03/27/2015 07:49 PM, Arnaud Le Hors wrote: > Now available: > https://www.w3.org/wiki/Socialwg/2015-03-31 Thanks Arnaud! I added a point which I find very urgent, I also make sure that this week my audio works. https://www.w3.org/wiki/Socialwg/2015-03-31#Defining_and_documenting_WG_workflows # Defining and documenting WG workflows[edit] We can't do the actual work that our charter defines if we struggle with our workflows and collaboration channels - Pavlik elf (talk) 14:03, 29 March 2015 (UTC) * Agenda workflow - our meetings can stay much more productive if participants *prepare* for them ** PROPOSAL: wiki page for n+1 meeting already exists during n meeting, we prepare agenda together tue-fri and *close* it on friday * Tracker workflow - if we need formal process to open and close issues, things like e.g. ISSUE-29 Removing Activity Types not used by User Stories will just slow us down. We tried using github for such details and it this particular case it even may fit IG charter. * Where WG & IG can work together? e.g. Vocabularies, Use Cases and Requirements ** ✗ mailing lists - membership restrictions, lack of participation from IndieWeb folks ** ✗ W3C tracker - membership restrictions, no push notifications ** ✓ wiki - no push notifications ** ✓ IRC - no push notifications ** ✓ Github - using orga account e.g. w3c-social or various personal accounts e.g. jasnell see also: * ISSUE-19 WG communication channel explosion * ACTION-52 Discuss re github
Received on Sunday, 29 March 2015 14:20:11 UTC