- From: ☮ elf Pavlik ☮ <perpetual-tripper@wwelves.org>
- Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2015 11:34:32 +0100
- To: Social Web Working Group <public-socialweb@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <550AA638.3000803@wwelves.org>
On 03/18/2015 09:54 PM, Social Web Working Group Issue Tracker wrote: > ISSUE-25: What syntax is (syntaxes are) to be used in the social api (eg microformats vs json-ld; form-encoding vs json-ld) > > http://www.w3.org/Social/track/issues/25 > > Raised by: > On product: Please note resolution from Day1 "RESOLVED: Close ISSUE-21 re-affirming we'll use JSON-LD as in the current draft, with a normative context, and let people bring up sub-issues" http://socialwg.indiewebcamp.com/irc/social/2015-03-17/line/1426616109938 And let's careful with terminology, I try to distinguish various aspects of microformats on Social syntax wiki page https://www.w3.org/wiki/Socialwg/Social_syntax * microformats *vocabulary* * microformats *serializations* ** microformats HTML ** microformats form-encoded ** microformats JSON ** microformats JSON-LD Just as RDF used different JSON serialization in a past, microformats can also adopt JSON-LD for alternative (new) JSON serializations. https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/rdf/raw-file/default/rdf-json/index.html JSON-LD spec even has some section on using it with microformats! http://www.w3.org/TR/json-ld/#microformats (also adding it as note to the issue!) HTH
Received on Thursday, 19 March 2015 10:34:51 UTC