W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-socialweb@w3.org > March 2015

Re: ISSUE-7: Are as consumers required to understand the pre-json-ld syntax?

From: <henry.story@bblfish.net>
Date: Sun, 8 Mar 2015 16:49:15 +0100
Cc: Elf Pavlik <perpetual-tripper@wwelves.org>, Social Web Working Group <public-socialweb@w3.org>
Message-Id: <CAFE2114-CAD5-43CB-BB14-4191D3700D6B@bblfish.net>
To: Erik Wilde <dret@berkeley.edu>

> On 6 Mar 2015, at 10:01, Erik Wilde <dret@berkeley.edu> wrote:
> iff plain *and* RDFified views are what we want, then i would still be in favor of clean layering. let's have a JSON spec that talks about JSON only. and then let's have an "RDF view of AS" through a separate spec that is based on the plain one and JSON-LD.

I'd suggest an RDF ontology published at the name space, with an html view over it (producing rdfa perhaps). And
then another group can work on a crystallisation of the json into the particular syntax the json people  care about. I think this group will have done the best by having an ontology. 

None of this is new. I wrote about this in rdf/xml land in 2006


Sadly we are still discussing the same issues now in json land. Luckily JavaScript is not far away,
so that at least the tooling can easily be adapted.


Social Web Architect
Received on Sunday, 8 March 2015 15:49:47 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 8 December 2016 15:48:20 UTC