W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-socialweb@w3.org > March 2015

Re: social-ACTION-43: propose *lightweight* inference based on RDFa Vocabulary Expansion (also: ISSUE-12)

From: Erik Wilde <dret@berkeley.edu>
Date: Fri, 06 Mar 2015 14:26:42 +0100
Message-ID: <54F9AB12.1030809@berkeley.edu>
To: ☮ elf Pavlik ☮ <perpetual-tripper@wwelves.org>, public-socialweb@w3.org
hello elf.

On 2015-03-06 12:22, ☮ elf Pavlik ☮ wrote:
> On 03/06/2015 12:10 PM, Social Web Working Group Issue Tracker wrote:
>> social-ACTION-43: propose *lightweight* inference based on RDFa Vocabulary Expansion
>> http://www.w3.org/Social/track/actions/43
>> Assigned to: Pavlik elf
>> On product: Activity Streams 2.0
>> propose *lightweight* inference based on RDFa Vocabulary Expansion
> associated it with ISSUE-12 Action Types Structure and Processing Model
> https://www.w3.org/Social/track/issues/12

it would be great if you could explicitly address the following points:

- is using inference optional or mandatory?

- what about core activities, such as saying that a "like" is a 
"respond". how does that work for producers and consumers?

- what about extension properties, such as saying that a "floop" is a 
"like". how does that work for producers and consumers?

- what are the inputs for the inference (i.e., is everything 
self-contained in activities, or do you need a "floop vocabulary" and if 
you do, what are the requirements for that), and what's the discovery 
model for them, if there are required resources beyond activities.

thanks and cheers,

dret.

-- 
erik wilde | mailto:dret@berkeley.edu  -  tel:+1-510-2061079 |
            | UC Berkeley  -  School of Information (ISchool) |
            | http://dret.net/netdret http://twitter.com/dret |
Received on Friday, 6 March 2015 13:27:14 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 8 December 2016 15:48:20 UTC