Re: Actor Type: Org

Actually, i was going to ask that very question.  Do we need actor types at
all or just limit to Actor.  None of the examples in the spec seem to
really make any distinction on the need for it, and I'm not sure the User
stories do either.

On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 12:24 PM, Evan Prodromou <evan@e14n.com> wrote:

>  Exactly, yes.
>
> -Evan
>
>
> On 2015-07-01 07:19 PM, Renato Iannella wrote:
>
>
>  On 2 Jul 2015, at 4:47 am, Ben <ben@thatmustbe.me> wrote:
>
> This User Story doesn't really seem to make the argument for a
> Organization as a type though.
> This is just an account where Actor happens to be a brand.
>
>
>  But there is no concept of “account” only actors.
>
>  So, step 2 in the use case [1] could be represented as:
>
>    "@type": "Follow",
>   "actor": {
>      "@type": "Person",
>      "displayName": “Damien"
>    },
>    "object": {
>       "@type": “Org",
>        "displayName": “Bubbly Inc.”
>     }
>   }
>
>
>   Cheers...
> Renato Iannella
> Semantic Identity
> http://semanticidentity.com
>
>  [1]
> https://www.w3.org/wiki/Socialwg/Social_API/More_user_stories#Following_a_brand
>
>
>
>
>