Re: Actor Type: Org

I don't think "Person" works for a brand. Did you have another idea? 
Just "Actor"?

-Evan

On 2015-07-01 02:47 PM, Ben wrote:
> This User Story doesn't really seem to make the argument for a 
> Organization as a type though.
> This is just an account where Actor happens to be a brand.
>
> On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 10:40 AM, Evan Prodromou <evan@e14n.com 
> <mailto:evan@e14n.com>> wrote:
>
>     I just added a new story for the very common case of following a
>     brand:
>
>     https://www.w3.org/wiki/Socialwg/Social_API/More_user_stories#Following_a_brand
>
>     -Evan
>
>
>     On 2015-06-30 07:44 PM, Renato Iannella wrote:
>>
>>>     On 30 Jun 2015, at 3:45 pm, Bassetti, Ann
>>>     <ann.bassetti@boeing.com <mailto:ann.bassetti@boeing.com>> wrote:
>>>
>>>     I agree with Renato that the concept of "org" seems important. 
>>>     Also, our initial set of core use cases seem limited, especially
>>>     from an enterprise (aka "org"?) point-of-view. I am presuming we
>>>     can expand our set of possibilities in the future.
>>
>>     There only seems to one “org”-based use case:
>>     https://www.w3.org/wiki/Socialwg/Social_API/User_stories#Co-operation_between_NGOs
>>
>>
>>     Cheers...
>>     Renato Iannella
>>     Semantic Identity
>>     http://semanticidentity.com
>>     Mobile: +61 4 1313 2206
>>
>
>