- From: Evan Prodromou <evan@e14n.com>
- Date: Thu, 02 Jul 2015 12:24:45 -0400
- To: public-socialweb@w3.org
Received on Thursday, 2 July 2015 16:25:18 UTC
Exactly, yes.
-Evan
On 2015-07-01 07:19 PM, Renato Iannella wrote:
>
>> On 2 Jul 2015, at 4:47 am, Ben <ben@thatmustbe.me
>> <mailto:ben@thatmustbe.me>> wrote:
>>
>> This User Story doesn't really seem to make the argument for a
>> Organization as a type though.
>> This is just an account where Actor happens to be a brand.
>
> But there is no concept of “account” only actors.
>
> So, step 2 in the use case [1] could be represented as:
>
> "@type": "Follow",
> "actor": {
> "@type": "Person",
> "displayName": “Damien"
> },
> "object": {
> "@type": “Org",
> "displayName": “Bubbly Inc.”
> }
> }
>
>
> Cheers...
> Renato Iannella
> Semantic Identity
> http://semanticidentity.com
>
> [1]
> https://www.w3.org/wiki/Socialwg/Social_API/More_user_stories#Following_a_brand
>
>
>
Received on Thursday, 2 July 2015 16:25:18 UTC