- From: Evan Prodromou <evan@e14n.com>
- Date: Thu, 02 Jul 2015 12:24:45 -0400
- To: public-socialweb@w3.org
Received on Thursday, 2 July 2015 16:25:18 UTC
Exactly, yes. -Evan On 2015-07-01 07:19 PM, Renato Iannella wrote: > >> On 2 Jul 2015, at 4:47 am, Ben <ben@thatmustbe.me >> <mailto:ben@thatmustbe.me>> wrote: >> >> This User Story doesn't really seem to make the argument for a >> Organization as a type though. >> This is just an account where Actor happens to be a brand. > > But there is no concept of “account” only actors. > > So, step 2 in the use case [1] could be represented as: > > "@type": "Follow", > "actor": { > "@type": "Person", > "displayName": “Damien" > }, > "object": { > "@type": “Org", > "displayName": “Bubbly Inc.” > } > } > > > Cheers... > Renato Iannella > Semantic Identity > http://semanticidentity.com > > [1] > https://www.w3.org/wiki/Socialwg/Social_API/More_user_stories#Following_a_brand > > >
Received on Thursday, 2 July 2015 16:25:18 UTC