- From: Ben <ben@thatmustbe.me>
- Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2015 14:47:14 -0400
- To: Social Web Working Group <public-socialweb@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAArs9Hhur_zTR2j3ynWgwLtjCXL0ebDEiN7y6wXEaKxb0Xpt4w@mail.gmail.com>
This User Story doesn't really seem to make the argument for a Organization as a type though. This is just an account where Actor happens to be a brand. On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 10:40 AM, Evan Prodromou <evan@e14n.com> wrote: > I just added a new story for the very common case of following a brand: > > > https://www.w3.org/wiki/Socialwg/Social_API/More_user_stories#Following_a_brand > > -Evan > > > On 2015-06-30 07:44 PM, Renato Iannella wrote: > > > On 30 Jun 2015, at 3:45 pm, Bassetti, Ann <ann.bassetti@boeing.com> > wrote: > > I agree with Renato that the concept of "org" seems important. Also, > our initial set of core use cases seem limited, especially from an > enterprise (aka "org"?) point-of-view. I am presuming we can expand our set > of possibilities in the future. > > > There only seems to one “org”-based use case: > > https://www.w3.org/wiki/Socialwg/Social_API/User_stories#Co-operation_between_NGOs > > > Cheers... > Renato Iannella > Semantic Identity > http://semanticidentity.com > Mobile: +61 4 1313 2206 > > >
Received on Wednesday, 1 July 2015 18:47:43 UTC