- From: <henry.story@bblfish.net>
- Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2015 22:04:58 +0100
- To: "public-socialweb@w3.org" <public-socialweb@w3.org>
- Cc: Carvalho Melvin <melvincarvalho@gmail.com>, Halpin Harry <hhalpin@w3.org>, Andrei Sambra <andrei.sambra@gmail.com>
I would like to work on the LDP based API to fit the Evans' [1] and Swat0's [2] requirements. This is going to be most fun if we do it as a group, so perhaps those of us here who have experience with LDP and those who would like to learn about how to think of it could gather and try to work out in a light weight manner how to sketch the main outlines of such an API. We could do this on the rww Community Group perhaps [3] and report on the W3C Social Web WG iteratively the results ( so that the learning curve does not end up being too high ). It would be good if as a group we could work out what the required results of this work should be. Henry > On 27 Jan 2015, at 21:41, Harry Halpin <hhalpin@w3.org> wrote: > > My proposal was that we take Evan Prodromou's draft requirements [1] > for an API and see if Evan and others interested can whiteboard an API for that > addresses SWAT0 [2] (and as much of the requirements EvanP found as the > editors think are reasonable for the API), keeping in mind OpenSocial's > previous work and LDP in mind in order to pave the cowpaths. > > Then, as long as SWAT0 and any other requirements are clearly > demarcated, we could at least start discussing a draft API in more > concrete terms. > > cheers, > harry > > [1] https://www.w3.org/wiki/Socialwg/Social_API/Requirements > [2] http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/federatedsocialweb/wiki/SWAT0 [3] http://www.w3.org/community/rww/ Social Web Architect http://bblfish.net/
Received on Tuesday, 27 January 2015 21:05:29 UTC