ldp + swat0

Henry and I were talking on IRC, and started a web page for this:

    https://www.w3.org/wiki/Socialwg/LDP-SWAT0


How often do you get to title a section of a document "Is Tantek 
interested?"

Seriously, I think SWAT0 is missing some spam and overload awareness.

      -- Sandro

On 01/27/2015 04:04 PM, henry.story@bblfish.net wrote:
> I would like to work on the LDP based API to fit the Evans' [1] and Swat0's [2]
> requirements. This is going to be most fun if we do it as a group, so perhaps
> those of us here who have experience with LDP and those who would like to learn
> about how to think of it could gather and try to work out in a light weight manner
> how to sketch the main outlines of such an API.
>
> We could do this on the rww Community Group perhaps [3] and report on the W3C Social
> Web WG iteratively the results ( so that the learning curve does not end up being too
> high ).
>
> It would be good if as a group we could work out what the required results of this
> work should be.
>
> Henry
>
>
>
>> On 27 Jan 2015, at 21:41, Harry Halpin <hhalpin@w3.org> wrote:
>>
>> My proposal was that we take Evan Prodromou's draft requirements [1]
>> for an API and see if Evan and others interested can whiteboard an API for that
>> addresses SWAT0 [2] (and as much of the requirements EvanP found as the
>> editors think are reasonable for the API), keeping in mind OpenSocial's
>> previous work and LDP in mind in order to pave the cowpaths.
>>
>> Then, as long as SWAT0 and any other requirements are clearly
>> demarcated, we could at least start discussing a draft API in more
>> concrete terms.
>>
>>    cheers,
>>        harry
>>          
>> [1] https://www.w3.org/wiki/Socialwg/Social_API/Requirements
>> [2] http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/federatedsocialweb/wiki/SWAT0
> [3] http://www.w3.org/community/rww/
>
>
>
> Social Web Architect
> http://bblfish.net/
>
>
>