Re: Social user stories -- time to vote

I extented the Tagging grouping and clarified the motivation for the tags
into three sections.  I also added a comments section with an explanation
as to why each particular story is a comment about something [hence an
annotation] rather than a stand alone post [and hence not an annotation].

Hope that helps!

Best,

Rob

On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 11:26 AM, ☮ elf Pavlik ☮ <
perpetual-tripper@wwelves.org> wrote:

> On 02/18/2015 08:22 PM, Robert Sanderson wrote:
> > Dear all,
> >
> > There are several stories that seem to have a great deal of overlap with
> > the scope of the Annotation Working Group.
> >
> > It would be great to work together on these rather than co-inventing
> > separate solutions to the same problem at the same time in the same
> > standards body.
> +1 (or +1000)
>
> >
> > In particular, I'd like to point out:
> >
> > ## User Comments about things:
> > * https://www.w3.org/wiki/Socialwg/Social_API/User_stories#Responses
> > *
> >
> https://www.w3.org/wiki/Socialwg/Social_API/User_stories#Answering_a_question
> > *
> >
> https://www.w3.org/wiki/Socialwg/Social_API/User_stories#Product_issue_reports
> > *
> >
> https://www.w3.org/wiki/Socialwg/Social_API/User_stories#Integration_:_Adding_recommendations_to_bespoke_software
> > *
> >
> https://www.w3.org/wiki/Socialwg/Social_API/User_stories#Integration_:_Adding_comments_to_bespoke_software
> > *
> >
> https://www.w3.org/wiki/Socialwg/Social_API/User_stories#Reply_in_a_discussion
> > *
> >
> https://www.w3.org/wiki/Socialwg/Social_API/User_stories#Comment_on_content
> > *
> >
> https://www.w3.org/wiki/Socialwg/Social_API/User_stories#Comments_And_Showing_Comments
> >
> > ## User Tagging:
> > *
> https://www.w3.org/wiki/Socialwg/Social_API/User_stories#Person_tagging
> > *
> https://www.w3.org/wiki/Socialwg/Social_API/User_stories#Location_tagging
> > * https://www.w3.org/wiki/Socialwg/Social_API/User_stories#Like_content
> > *
> >
> https://www.w3.org/wiki/Socialwg/Social_API/User_stories#Content_location_tagging
> > *
> https://www.w3.org/wiki/Socialwg/Social_API/User_stories#Report_content
> > *
> https://www.w3.org/wiki/Socialwg/Social_API/User_stories#Tagging_a_Post
> > *
> >
> https://www.w3.org/wiki/Socialwg/Social_API/User_stories#Liking_And_Showing_Likes
> could you please try to capture this email as groupings on one of those
> pages
> * https://www.w3.org/wiki/Socialwg/Social_API/User_stories/Groupings
> * https://www.w3.org/wiki/Socialwg/Social_API/User_stories/Implementations
>
> we still experiment with structuring/linking all those stories
>
>
> Cheers!
>
>
>
> >
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> > Rob
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 10:32 AM, ☮ elf Pavlik ☮ <
> > perpetual-tripper@wwelves.org> wrote:
> >
> >> On 02/18/2015 05:23 PM, Evan Prodromou wrote:
> >>> So, per our discussion yesterday, we're no longer taking new user
> >>> stories. It's time to start doing +1/0/-1 voting.
> >>>
> >>> https://www.w3.org/wiki/Socialwg/Social_API/User_stories
> >>>
> >>> We'll close this out next week at midnight Tuesday EST, so please take
> >>> the time to review this week.
> >> Evan, I needed to add comment under :Reply in a discussion" story,
> >> motivated by your question. It ended up *out of context* after us
> >> experimenting with section/no-section, linked groupings and all that
> >> stuff...
> >>
> >> I hope it clarifies the difference and shows real world requirement
> >> commonly used in the wild. Please reconsider your -1, Thx!
> >>
> >>
> >>
> https://www.w3.org/wiki/Socialwg/Social_API/User_stories#Reply_in_a_discussion
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
>
>
>


-- 
Rob Sanderson
Information Standards Advocate
Digital Library Systems and Services
Stanford, CA 94305