Re: User stories for Social API

On 2015-02-05 07:51 AM, henry.story@bblfish.net wrote:
> we dont' want to do that in the user stories ... they have to be 
> implementation independent at this point ...
+1
> let's try to stay on focus on the mailing list, and if people want to 
> have more technical discussions about plumbing, that's off topic for 
> the WG and you can do that in the IG ]]
Not quite. They're fine conversations to have, and this is the venue for 
talking about technical discussions.

But they're confusing when we're talking about user stories.
> So we should have user stories for the social web. Later we can decide 
> wether we need one or two or three of 50 apis. Can we construct a 
> consensus on this?
I agree!

-Evan

Received on Thursday, 5 February 2015 16:43:32 UTC