- From: Erik Wilde <dret@berkeley.edu>
- Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2015 12:41:42 -0800
- To: Lloyd Fassett <lloyd@azteria.com>, "public-socialweb@w3.org" <public-socialweb@w3.org>
hello.
On 2015-02-04 11:52 , Lloyd Fassett wrote:
> I think Henry makes an illuminating and important point. A Social API
> derived exclusively from analyzing the existing API's of big social
> players is not the Social Web.
https://www.mnot.net/blog/2012/06/25/http_api_complexity_model might be
an interesting read in the context of this thread. back at the TPAC F2F,
we decided that the "Social API" in the charter should be interpreted to
be a "RESTful HTTP API". my assumption was that then it clearly should
be one matching mark's "Many Clients, Many Servers" category. are we now
backtracking to say that the API actually is something different?
cheers,
dret.
--
erik wilde | mailto:dret@berkeley.edu - tel:+1-510-2061079 |
| UC Berkeley - School of Information (ISchool) |
| http://dret.net/netdret http://twitter.com/dret |
Received on Wednesday, 4 February 2015 20:42:09 UTC