- From: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2015 06:56:20 -0800
- To: Evan Prodromou <evan@e14n.com>
- Cc: public-socialweb@w3.org, Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net>
Received on Wednesday, 4 February 2015 14:56:47 UTC
On Feb 4, 2015 5:54 AM, "Evan Prodromou" <evan@e14n.com> wrote: > > On 2015-02-04 06:01 AM, henry.story@bblfish.net wrote: >> [snip] > >> We could extend the user stories to make them more clearly cross organisational. > > That would be a grievous mistake at this point. > We need both views, quite frankly. I mean, that's really the point isn't it? > We have as one of our deliverables a federation protocol. Our social API is the client-to-server piece; the federation protocol is the server-to-server piece. > > We should make a point of not putting forward a social API that isn't compatible with federation. However, it should not be dependent on federation. > Nor should we fool ourselves into thinking that the social API and federation bits are two separate things. Done properly, cross organizational federation becomes a natural feature of the social API. - James > -Evan > > > >
Received on Wednesday, 4 February 2015 14:56:47 UTC