- From: Andreas Kuckartz <a.kuckartz@ping.de>
- Date: Sun, 01 Feb 2015 21:59:09 +0100
- To: public-socialweb@w3.org
☮ elf Pavlik ☮ wrote: > I would prefer not to put limitations of JRD upon our work, and use > webfinger *only* as a way to get equivalent http: / https: URI for > URIs using other schemes acct: , mailto: , xmpp: etc. I had a look at the Webfinger specification. JRD (JSON Resource Descriptor) does not look like something I want to use in the future. It is a JSON-formatted XRD document and has its own media type (application/jrd+json). And XRD (eXtensible Resource Descriptor) is "a simple generic format for describing and discovering resources". Something like Webfinger but based on JSON-LD might be good, but that depends on it being in scope here. > Then stating the actual relations (links/predicates) in JSON-LD > document representing particular resource. +1 Cheers, Andreas
Received on Sunday, 1 February 2015 20:59:33 UTC