- From: ☮ elf Pavlik ☮ <perpetual-tripper@wwelves.org>
- Date: Sun, 01 Feb 2015 13:33:11 +0100
- To: Harry Halpin <hhalpin@w3.org>, Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>, Evan Prodromou <evan@e14n.com>
- CC: public-socialweb@w3.org
- Message-ID: <54CE1D07.2060200@wwelves.org>
On 01/31/2015 05:28 PM, Harry Halpin wrote: > > > On 01/31/2015 03:47 AM, Sandro Hawke wrote: >> On 01/29/2015 04:30 PM, Evan Prodromou wrote: >>> Everyone is blown away by the size of these requirements already. >>> >>> A streaming protocol for streams would be a great addition later, but >>> trying to jam it in here will literally sink this project. >>> >>> Please accept this as being out of scope. >> >> I might be misunderstanding what you mean by "out of scope". To me, in >> a WG, "out of scope" means "we're not even going to talk about this >> issue, because it's not the kind of problem our charter says we're >> supposed to talk about". In general, it's up to the chairs in guiding >> to conversation to steer it away from things that are out of scope (in >> this sense) given their reading of the charter. >> >> What I think you're saying above is that you don't think streams/push >> should be one of the requirements for the API. That's plausible, but >> maybe we can label that as "Not a requirement", instead of "out of >> scope"? That is, it's up to the group to come to consensus on what >> the requirements for the API are, and you're arguing this should not be >> one. I'm sympathetic to your argument, but I'd also be interested in >> hearing whether likely vendors of this stuff think they can sell systems >> without streaming/push. >> >> The alternative interpretation is that maybe you think our charter >> doesn't allow us to even consider this as a possible requirement, that >> it's out-of-scope for the group. Like, an authentication system would >> surely be out-of-scope, and Harry was just arguing that WebFinger is out >> of scope. > > As pointed out, WebApps is already dealing with streaming and push. We > should simply co-ordinate around their Rec-track work (which has all > browser vendors involved BTW) and rather than reinvent wheel. Could you please share with us relevant link(s)? Maybe even add it to the wiki: https://www.w3.org/wiki/Socialwg/Streaming_%26_Push
Received on Sunday, 1 February 2015 12:33:36 UTC