On Thu Oct 23 2014 at 9:13:17 AM Erik Wilde <dret@berkeley.edu> wrote: > hello. > > On 2014-10-23, 9:05 , Andreas Kuckartz wrote: > > I am in favor of using the w3.org namespace. See also: > > http://www.w3.org/2005/07/13-nsuri > > But as far as I know using dates in URIs by the W3C so far has not > > really been helpful. It is almost impossible to get rid of such dates > > later. And I don't know why or if "www." is needed. > > discussing the exact structure of the URI is a bit bike-shedding, as it > is nothing but an opaque identifier. it would be smart for the w3c to > have a naming policy/recommendation in place, but if they don't, then i > think pretty much any path is ok. > > I'm following the guidelines/recommendations published here: http://www.w3.org/2005/07/13-nsuri > the only thing i think would be smart to avoid is to create the > impression that the namespace applies to the terms as they are used in > AS1, which is why i would vote against any URI that says something like > "AS1" in it. > > +1 > cheers, > > dret. > > -- > erik wilde | mailto:dret@berkeley.edu - tel:+1-510-2061079 | > | UC Berkeley - School of Information (ISchool) | > | http://dret.net/netdret http://twitter.com/dret | > >Received on Thursday, 23 October 2014 16:16:25 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:26:13 UTC