Re: Activity Streams URI Namespace

On Thu Oct 23 2014 at 9:13:17 AM Erik Wilde <dret@berkeley.edu> wrote:

> hello.
>
> On 2014-10-23, 9:05 , Andreas Kuckartz wrote:
> > I am in favor of using the w3.org namespace. See also:
> > http://www.w3.org/2005/07/13-nsuri
> > But as far as I know using dates in URIs by the W3C so far has not
> > really been helpful. It is almost impossible to get rid of such dates
> > later. And I don't know why or if "www." is needed.
>
> discussing the exact structure of the URI is a bit bike-shedding, as it
> is nothing but an opaque identifier. it would be smart for the w3c to
> have a naming policy/recommendation in place, but if they don't, then i
> think pretty much any path is ok.
>
>
I'm following the guidelines/recommendations published here:

  http://www.w3.org/2005/07/13-nsuri


> the only thing i think would be smart to avoid is to create the
> impression that the namespace applies to the terms as they are used in
> AS1, which is why i would vote against any URI that says something like
> "AS1" in it.
>
>
+1


> cheers,
>
> dret.
>
> --
> erik wilde | mailto:dret@berkeley.edu  -  tel:+1-510-2061079 |
>             | UC Berkeley  -  School of Information (ISchool) |
>             | http://dret.net/netdret http://twitter.com/dret |
>
>