Re: TPAC: Schema.org and Social WG ( legal / technical )

On 10/23/2014 11:39 AM, ☮ elf Pavlik ☮ wrote:
> On 10/23/2014 01:30 AM, James M Snell wrote:
>> I'm planning on attending the BOF.
> Great! I let myself add your name to wiki as interested in this session
> and will also notify Sam.
> https://www.w3.org/wiki/TPAC2014/SessionIdeas#Schema.org_and_Social_WG
> 
> Harry, do you have some strategy for how to create space supporting both
> legal and technical discussions? Should we also add time information to
> the session description, I remember you sending note mentioning 9AM.

It's an informal discussion.

There will likely not be remote participation for the 9:15 AM session,
as they are done small-group style. We'll take notes though and send
them out.

   cheers,
     harry

> 
> If we have possibility of remote participation then me, and maybe
> Markus, could join technical discussion as well. I will do my best to
> catch up with current state of art in Hydra CG and try my best to
> represent it remotely in conversation in case Markus can't connect on
> that day. Maybe also we could take a look at making update to
> 'Integration of Hydra into Schema.org' draft
> http://www.hydra-cg.com/spec/latest/schema.org/
> 
> James, you might find interesting latest call for consensus from Hydra
> CG on IriTemplate design:
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-hydra/2014Oct/0119.html it
> also introduces hydra:rfc6570Template datatype.
> 
> o/
> 
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 22, 2014, 4:28 PM ☮ elf Pavlik ☮
>> <perpetual-tripper@wwelves.org <mailto:perpetual-tripper@wwelves.org>>
>> wrote:
>>
>>     Hello,
>>
>>     I asked Sam Goto, who leads schema.org/Action
>>     <http://schema.org/Action> development, if he would
>>     like to join this Wednesday TPAC session[1]. He replied:
>>
>>     "I don't know yet ... if most people are interested in things like
>>     licensing and legalises of schema.org <http://schema.org>, Guha is
>>     going and can represent
>>     that a lot better than I.
>>
>>     If, however, there are folks that are interested in discussing the
>>     technical/concrete merits of one approach over the other, than I think
>>     it is a forum that I can contribute to constructively.
>>
>>     The last time I presented to this group there wasn't anything that I
>>     could really respond to, so I'm unsure if I'll attend."
>>
>>
>>     Since schema:Action and as:Activity have huge overlap [2], as well as
>>     as:PotentialActionHandler and schema:EntryPoint. I think it would make a
>>     lot of sense to take opportunity of meeting face to face to see
>>     possibilities of coordinating our efforts.
>>
>>     James, currently I don't see you among people interested in
>>     participating in this session. Would you consider discussing technical
>>     aspects of ActivityStreams 2.0 and Schema.org/Action with Sam?
>>
>>     Tantek, maybe you could also bring experience with <indie-action>[3] to
>>     the table?
>>
>>     I also added to session description links to
>>     * http://activitystrea.ms/head/__activity-schema.html#verbs
>>     <http://activitystrea.ms/head/activity-schema.html#verbs>
>>     * http://activitystrea.ms/head/__activity-schema.html#object-__types
>>     <http://activitystrea.ms/head/activity-schema.html#object-types>
>>
>>     This topic I see on the border of techinical / political? discussion.
>>     IMO having ActivityStreams, Schema.org and Microformats all defining
>>     very similar concepts doesn't make live easier for people who implement
>>     publishing and consuming of social data :(
>>
>>     Could we try to clarify interests for that meeting among Social WG
>>     participants in next 2 days and then also have conversation over
>>     public-vocabs?
>>
>>     I see combining legal / technical / hybrid topics somehow
>>     challenging ...
>>
>>     Cheers!
>>
>>     [1]
>>     https://www.w3.org/wiki/__TPAC2014/SessionIdeas#Schema.__org_and_Social_WG
>>     <https://www.w3.org/wiki/TPAC2014/SessionIdeas#Schema.org_and_Social_WG>
>>     [2]
>>     https://www.w3.org/wiki/__Socialwg/Vocabulary___Comparison#as:Activity_.7C.7C___schema:Action
>>     <https://www.w3.org/wiki/Socialwg/Vocabulary_Comparison#as:Activity_.7C.7C_schema:Action>
>>     [3] http://indiewebcamp.com/__webactions
>>     <http://indiewebcamp.com/webactions>
>>
> 
>

Received on Thursday, 23 October 2014 10:40:53 UTC