Re: Hosted JSON-LD context

On 10/06/2014 11:36 PM, James M Snell wrote:
> Yep... that's a challenge with the JSON-LD mapping in this case.
> Activity Streams 1.0 allows "verb" and "objectType" to be simple token
> values like "post", or "person"... those don't expand out to URI's...
> they are *just* tokens. The values of those fields can also be fully
> qualified IRI's, however. There's no way to model that in JSON-LD
> currently.
I hope tomorrow we'll get chance to discuss it over call:
https://www.w3.org/wiki/Socialwg/2014-10-07#ActivityStreams_2.0_compatibility_with_AS1.0_and_JSON-LD

/me needs to catch some ZZZzzz... now :) gnight!

> 
> On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 2:32 PM, ☮ elf Pavlik ☮
> <perpetual-tripper@wwelves.org> wrote:
>> On 10/06/2014 11:09 PM, James M Snell wrote:
>>> For debugging and experimentation purposes, I have hosted the current
>>> editor's draft version of the Activity Streams 2.0 JSON-LD @context
>>> here: http://asjsonld.mybluemix.net/
>> oh yeah! CORS enabled \o/
>>
>>>
>>> You can use this, for instance, with the JSON-LD Playground:
>>> http://goo.gl/bY3p5j
>> in your example you have "verb": "post" (string literal not IRI, while
>> no @base set)
>> while context defines
>> "verb": {
>>         "@id": "as:verb",
>>         "@type": "@id"
>>       }
>>
>> so N-Quads tab has only 3 statements and no as:verb "post"
>>
>> which makes me once again worry about
>> https://github.com/jasnell/w3c-socialwg-activitystreams/issues/23
>

Received on Monday, 6 October 2014 21:44:11 UTC