- From: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2014 14:36:44 -0700
- To: ☮ elf Pavlik ☮ <perpetual-tripper@wwelves.org>
- Cc: "public-socialweb@w3.org" <public-socialweb@w3.org>
Yep... that's a challenge with the JSON-LD mapping in this case.
Activity Streams 1.0 allows "verb" and "objectType" to be simple token
values like "post", or "person"... those don't expand out to URI's...
they are *just* tokens. The values of those fields can also be fully
qualified IRI's, however. There's no way to model that in JSON-LD
currently.
On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 2:32 PM, ☮ elf Pavlik ☮
<perpetual-tripper@wwelves.org> wrote:
> On 10/06/2014 11:09 PM, James M Snell wrote:
>> For debugging and experimentation purposes, I have hosted the current
>> editor's draft version of the Activity Streams 2.0 JSON-LD @context
>> here: http://asjsonld.mybluemix.net/
> oh yeah! CORS enabled \o/
>
>>
>> You can use this, for instance, with the JSON-LD Playground:
>> http://goo.gl/bY3p5j
> in your example you have "verb": "post" (string literal not IRI, while
> no @base set)
> while context defines
> "verb": {
> "@id": "as:verb",
> "@type": "@id"
> }
>
> so N-Quads tab has only 3 statements and no as:verb "post"
>
> which makes me once again worry about
> https://github.com/jasnell/w3c-socialwg-activitystreams/issues/23
Received on Monday, 6 October 2014 21:37:31 UTC