- From: Harry Halpin <hhalpin@ibiblio.org>
- Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 04:57:40 -0500 (EST)
- Cc: public-social-web-talk@w3.org
I feel the proposed charter may be too large, due to having too many deliverables (15 at my last count). A smaller charter with (5) deliverables was written earlier. I propose reverting to the earlier charter, and want this discussed at the telecon. Most other W3C XGs have a SINGLE deliverable, a final report. I recommend people read the "Quick Start Guide to Incubator Groups" by the W3C and look at the charters of other XGs. [1] Also, I believe there is a misunderstanding of the nature of task-forces. Usually task forces are created to communicate *in-between* existing working groups, not *within* working groups. If there are internal task-forces, will they have separate lists or telecons? Unless this is so, there is no reason to have separate task-forces. I propose instead we keep the XG simple. Since this proposed charter has therefore become unwieldy [2], I propose that we return to the simpler earlier charter [3]. IMHO I believe the task force model will create a level of unnecessary bureaucracy. W3C Process has been developed over years of experience developing specifications like HTML, XML, and more. Having a good and tested process is a good thing. I think it should only be changed as needed, and kept simple. Note that deliverables are the contract of the Incubator Group to the W3C, and it is expected deliverables will be completed within the XG's time frame (1 year) and have a high-level of quality. Extra telecon time can be reserved as needed and task-forces or separate list-servs can be created as needed once the group begins. In general, an open, transparent process with minimal overhead is the way to go. If there is lots of activity, we can ask to be made an activity with separate working groups after a year. If confused by W3C Process, I suggest people look at the W3C Process document as well for information about charters and W3C Process in general [4]. This applies especially to people who are asking for deviations from standard W3C process. [1] http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/xg-guide [2] http://esw.w3.org/topic/UnifiedSocialXG [3] http://esw.w3.org/topic/SocialWebXGCharter [4] http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Process/
Received on Thursday, 26 February 2009 09:58:52 UTC