- From: ☮ elf Pavlik ☮ <perpetual-tripper@wwelves.org>
- Date: Fri, 05 Sep 2014 12:09:38 +0200
- To: public-social-interest@w3.org
On 09/05/2014 01:20 AM, Harry Halpin wrote: > On 09/01/2014 10:40 PM, ☮ elf Pavlik ☮ wrote: >> Hello, > >> I would like to propose recording and publishing audio from IG & >> WG telecons. Written minutes sometimes don't capture the >> conversation very well and having audio available can make it >> easier for everyone interested to follow the work. I would find >> it useful especially for WG which to my understanding has vary >> restrictive requirements for joining (IMO currently also not very >> clearly explained). > >> Web Payments CG records and publishes telecons in very nice way: >> https://web-payments.org/minutes/ > > Groups can make their own decisions on this front, historically > that's audio recordings are not done due to the fact that people > may make mistakes speaking they want corrected and so members, in > particular companies, feel comfortable disclosing informally things > they may not want formally disclosed. The Web Payments CG seem to > have about 5 people on telcos and one small business doing > implementing, so it's probably not an issue for them. Ok, I understand your points! > > Note that also your Invited Expert application was approved. > However, we are not very restrictive but we do require chair or > staff approval. Yes, it made possible for me to join the WG telecon just few hours later :) Much appreciated! > > Re IEs in general for at least implementation-focused WGs it makes > sense to let only people who are building systems or who have > built systems into the WG given its focus on implementation. > Otherwise, as we've seen in quite a few Community Groups, the > discussion gets side-tracked rather easily from their schedule. The > Community Groups of course still exist for general discussion. Soon I would like to post invitation to compile a wiki page to clearly explain which concerns belong to which group. At this moment thinking mostly of Social WG, Social IG and Federated Social Web CG. > > > > >> Could we get something working already for meetings in next two >> days? > > Unless the IG or WG explicitly asks for this, the W3C does do it > by default. I understand you meant: "W3C does NOT do it by default" > > cheers, harry > >> Thanks! Thanks++ > >
Received on Friday, 5 September 2014 10:11:55 UTC