Re: FW: Block Diagram cross posted from Social Web Headlights Task Force - feedback

On 4/30/2012 12:14 PM, Bassetti, Ann wrote:
>
> I'm forwarding Alberto's comments (below), which I think are very 
> useful, to the "Headlights" list.Thanks, Alberto!
>
> I'd also like to point out there is still confusion about the 
> relationship between the "Social Business Community Group" and the 
> "Social Networking Headlights Task Force" work.
>

Sorry about the confusion.  Here's my view.

Social Business Community Group.  As a CG, this group is focused on 
"pre-standardization" work.  That is, it is not (at the moment) leading 
to REC level activity.  Also, it is selected for itself the scope of 
"Social Business", not all of Social.

Social Networking Headlight Task Force.  At one level, since it is a 
task force, it is even more exploratory than the CG.  However, it has a 
defined objective to complete by July and make recommendations about 
areas that W3C should invest in - to lead to REC level specifications 
work.  It has not restricted its scope to Social Business.

These should be complimentary.  To the extent that there are activities 
in the CG ready to advance to the REC track, we would hope to identify 
them in the task force.  That is why we have so much discussion between 
the two groups.


> I, for one, encourage people in the Community Group to join the Task 
> Force call next Monday, May 7^th , 10am Eastern Daylight Time:
>
> ·617.761.6200 x7621#
>
> ·http://irc.w3.org/ ... enter the #social channel
>
> Wiki for Social 
> Headlights:http://www.w3.org/wiki/SocialWebHeadlightsTaskForce
>
> Similarly, folks in Headlights group might want to attend the 
> Community Group meeting tomorrow (May 1^st , 12:00 noon Eastern time)
>
> http://www.w3.org/community/socbizcg/event/regular-work-group-meeting-5/
>
> -- Ann
>
> *From:*Alberto Manuel [mailto:bpm.tst@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Monday, April 30, 2012 4:17 AM
> *To:* internal-socbizcg@w3.org; public-socbizcg@w3.org
> *Subject:* Block Diagram cross posted from Social Web Headlights Task 
> Force - feedback
>
> Hi everyone:
>
> This is my feedback from the latest version of the document.
>
> *Messaging:*
>
>   * Mobile is a platform, not a messaging type. A person can
>     send/receive messages using a desktop, laptop, table, mobile phone ...
>   * Connected objects - mean internet of things related?
>   * Forward / reply - this is an action (like delete) that we can do
>     using e-mail. Or means a different thing?
>
> *Group Dynamics:*
>
>   * Create/Join/End - are actions a person can execute on a wiki a
>     forum, alternatively I propose Community management
>   * Membership/Group/Distribution - maybe too granular; can't we
>     aggregate this into  Community lists?
>   * Think is missing: Agenda
>
> *Collaboration / news feed*: (These categories are Aggregators, a one 
> way communication tool, thus putting collaboration maybe misleading)
>
> Regarding technical foundations, Ontologies can play a critical role 
> helping in very big companies finding the people with skills to help 
> participating in a project or a particular activity, and also to 
> clarify the meaning of concepts.
>
> Cheers
>
> Alberto
>
> -- 
> Alberto Manuel
> http://ultrabpm.wordpress.com/
> http://pt.linkedin.com/in/albertomanuel
>