W3C home
Mailing lists
Public
public-soap-jms@w3.org
public-soap-jms@w3.org from May 2010
by thread
30 messages
:
Starting
Monday, 3 May 2010 23:21:23 UTC,
Ending
Wednesday, 26 May 2010 14:27:59 UTC
Sort by
:
thread
author
date
subject
Mail actions
:
mail a new topic
Help
:
how to use the archives
search the archives
ACTION 173 - discuss URI scheme reviewers with IBM JMS spec. contacts
Mark Phillips
(Wednesday, 26 May)
Action 174 - Send some reference links to the mailin list to support this proposal
Peter Easton
(Tuesday, 25 May)
Minutes: 2010-05-25
Mark Phillips
(Tuesday, 25 May)
Resolution of ACTION-148 and Issue 29
Mark Phillips
(Tuesday, 25 May)
Agenda for the 2010-05-25 conference call
Eric Johnson
(Tuesday, 25 May)
ACTION-168 - Develop a more detailed proposal for issue 34
Peter Easton
(Monday, 24 May)
Publishing "jms" URI scheme
Eric Johnson
(Monday, 24 May)
Re: Publishing "jms" URI scheme
Phil Adams
(Monday, 24 May)
Minutes: 2010-05-18
Mark Phillips
(Tuesday, 18 May)
Action-163 Contact people who are committing changes related to SOAP/JMS for the Apache CXF project
Peter Easton
(Tuesday, 18 May)
Agenda for the 2010-05-18 conference call
Eric Johnson
(Tuesday, 18 May)
ISSUE-37 (Non-fault SOAP 1.2 test cases): We should have SOAP 1.2 one-way and two-way test cases that are non fault cases [SOAP-JMS Test cases]
SOAP-JMS Binding Working Group Issue Tracker
(Monday, 17 May)
ISSUE-36 (Test cases with incorrect assertion references): soap-jms test-cases 1003 and 1103 should be reviewed perhaps have assertion references changed [SOAP-JMS Test cases]
SOAP-JMS Binding Working Group Issue Tracker
(Monday, 17 May)
ISSUE-35 (Test cases with wrong delivery mode): soap-jms test-cases 0013, 0014, 0015, 0016 expected message delivery mode should be 2(PERSISTENT) [SOAP-JMS Test cases]
SOAP-JMS Binding Working Group Issue Tracker
(Monday, 17 May)
ISSUE-34 (Fault sub-code QName): XML Schema should define fault sub-code QName types [SOAP-JMS Binding specification]
SOAP-JMS Binding Working Group Issue Tracker
(Monday, 17 May)
Request To Raise Issue: We should have SOAP 1.2 one-way and two-way test cases that are non fault cases
Peter Easton
(Monday, 17 May)
Re: Request To Raise Issue: We should have SOAP 1.2 one-way and two-way test cases that are non fault cases
Eric Johnson
(Monday, 17 May)
Request To Raise Issue: soap-jms test-cases 1003 and 1103 should be reviewed perhaps assertion references changed
Peter Easton
(Monday, 17 May)
Request To Raise Issue: soap-jms test-cases 0013, 0014, 0015, 0016 expected message delivery mode should be 2(PERSISTENT)
Peter Easton
(Monday, 17 May)
Re: Request To Raise Issue: soap-jms test-cases 0013, 0014, 0015, 0016 expected message delivery mode should be 2(PERSISTENT)
Eric Johnson
(Monday, 17 May)
Request To Raise Issue: soap-jms schema should define fault sub-code QName types
Peter Easton
(Monday, 17 May)
Re: Request To Raise Issue: soap-jms schema should define fault sub-code QName types
Eric Johnson
(Monday, 17 May)
Minutes 2010/05/11
Mark Phillips
(Tuesday, 11 May)
Action-162 new test cases for isFault
Eric Johnson
(Tuesday, 11 May)
Agenda for the 2010-05-11 conference call
Eric Johnson
(Monday, 10 May)
Action-160: apply test coverage proposals
Phil Adams
(Thursday, 6 May)
Action-161: update available
Phil Adams
(Thursday, 6 May)
ACTION-164.ACTION-165
Peter Easton
(Wednesday, 5 May)
Notes from today's (2010-05-04) abbreviated meeting
Eric Johnson
(Tuesday, 4 May)
Agenda for the 2010-05-04 conference call
Eric Johnson
(Monday, 3 May)
Last message date
: Wednesday, 26 May 2010 14:27:59 UTC