Re: Request To Raise Issue: soap-jms schema should define fault sub-code QName types

• From: Eric Johnson <eric@tibco.com>
• Date: Mon, 17 May 2010 13:26:13 -0700
• To: Peter Easton <peaston@progress.com>
• CC: "public-soap-jms@w3.org" <public-soap-jms@w3.org>
• Message-ID: <4BF1A665.7000507@tibco.com>

Hi Peter,

I've logged this as:
http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/soapjms/tracker/issues/34

-Eric.

On 05/17/2010 12:07 PM, Peter Easton wrote:
> The soap-jms schema(currently the schema is an attachment to Action 44) should be enhanced to include fault sub-codes.
>
> For example:
>
>  	<xs:simpleType name="FaultCodesType">
> 		<xs:restriction base="xs:QName">
> 			<xs:enumeration value="tns:contentTypeMismatch"/>
> 			<xs:enumeration value="tns:malformedRequestURI"/>
> 			<xs:enumeration value="tns:mismatchedSoapAction"/>
> 			<xs:enumeration value="tns:missingContentType"/>
> 			<xs:enumeration value="tns:missingRequestURI"/>
> 			<xs:enumeration value="tns:unrecognizedBindingVersion"/>
> 			<xs:enumeration value="tns:unsupportedJMSMessageFormat"/>
> 		</xs:restriction>
> 	</xs:simpleType>
>
>   

Received on Monday, 17 May 2010 20:26:30 UTC