public-soap-jms@w3.org from August 2009 by subject

ACTION-103, ACTION-104: completed

• Phil Adams (Wednesday, 12 August)

Action-106 - proposed UDDI entry for JMS transport

• Eric Johnson (Monday, 24 August)

ACTION-107: regen testcase doc assertions table

• Phil Adams (Tuesday, 18 August)

ACTION-91 - proposal to resolve ISSUE-8

• Phil Adams (Tuesday, 11 August)
• Eric Johnson (Monday, 10 August)

Action-93 resolved

• Eric Johnson (Monday, 24 August)

Agenda for 2009-08-04 conference call

• Mark Phillips (Tuesday, 4 August)
• Yves Lafon (Tuesday, 4 August)
• Eric Johnson (Tuesday, 4 August)

Agenda for 2009-08-11 conference call

• Peter Easton (Tuesday, 11 August)
• Eric Johnson (Monday, 10 August)

Agenda for 2009-08-25 conference call

• Peter Easton (Tuesday, 25 August)
• Eric Johnson (Monday, 24 August)

Agenda for 2009-09-01 conference call

• Eric Johnson (Monday, 31 August)

Agenda for the 2009-08-18 conference call

• Eric Johnson (Monday, 17 August)

ISSUE-10: Combine redundant assertions 2016 and 2017

• SOAP-JMS Binding Working Group Issue Tracker (Monday, 10 August)

ISSUE-10: update available

• Phil Adams (Tuesday, 18 August)
• Phil Adams (Tuesday, 18 August)

ISSUE-11 (requestURI in response message?): Should SOAPJMS_requestURI be in the response message? [SOAP-JMS Binding specification]

• SOAP-JMS Binding Working Group Issue Tracker (Monday, 24 August)

ISSUE-1: update available

• Eric Johnson (Monday, 10 August)
• Phil Adams (Monday, 10 August)

ISSUE-2: update available

• Eric Johnson (Monday, 10 August)
• Phil Adams (Monday, 10 August)

ISSUE-3: update available

• Eric Johnson (Monday, 10 August)
• Phil Adams (Monday, 10 August)

ISSUE-5: update available

• Phil Adams (Tuesday, 11 August)

ISSUE-6: update available

• Phil Adams (Tuesday, 11 August)

ISSUE-7: update available

• Phil Adams (Tuesday, 11 August)

ISSUE-8: update available

• Phil Adams (Tuesday, 18 August)

ISSUE-9: clarification on proposed re-wording of assertions

• Phil Adams (Tuesday, 18 August)

ISSUE-9: Clarify wording of assertions that deal with fault subcodes [SOAP-JMS Binding specification]

• SOAP-JMS Binding Working Group Issue Tracker (Monday, 10 August)

Minutes 2009/08/11

• Mark Phillips (Tuesday, 11 August)

NEW ISSUE: Should SOAPJMS_requestURI be in the response message?

• Eric Johnson (Monday, 24 August)

URI Specification IP Language

• Peter Easton (Tuesday, 25 August)

Last message date: Monday, 31 August 2009 21:59:38 UTC