- From: Yves Lafon <ylafon@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 07:39:40 -0400 (EDT)
- To: Eric Johnson <eric@tibco.com>
- cc: SOAP-JMS <public-soap-jms@w3.org>
On Mon, 3 Aug 2009, Eric Johnson wrote: > Greetings, our next call will take place on Tuesday 2009-08-04 at > 16:00UTC and last for at most 1 hour. > http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/meetingdetails.html?year=2009&month=08&day=04&hour=16&min=0&sec=0&p1=136&p2=179&p3=283 Regrets, in a f2f. > > We will be using the Zakim bridge [1], the phone numbers and passcode > for the call can be found at: http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/soapjms/admin > > Participants are invited to join IRC channel #soap-jms as documented on > the WG's administrative home page: > http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/soapjms/admin#irc > > 1) Appointment of the scribe > > 2) Minutes > Minutes of last call: http://www.w3.org/2009/07/28-soap-jms-minutes.html > > 3) Review the agenda > > 4) Review action items > Actions: http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/soapjms/tracker/actions/open > > 5) URI specification: > Resolve IP language and resubmit - any progress? > * We need to get all contributors to current version to agree to the > same IP language, preferably the 200902trust. Now waiting on: > * Oracle > * Progress > > Received OK from TIBCO, Software AG, IBM > > Any updates? > > 6) Raised issues: > > Which of these do we want to open? > http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/soapjms/tracker/issues/raised > > Issue-1: Protocol-2013 is spurious > http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/soapjms/tracker/issues/1 > > Issue-2: Protocol-2020 is spurious > http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/soapjms/tracker/issues/2 > > Issue-3: Protocol-2023 is spurious > http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/soapjms/tracker/issues/3 > > Issue-4: Protocol-2024 needs restructuring > http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/soapjms/tracker/issues/4 > See proposed resolution: > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-soap-jms/2009Jul/0030.html > > Issue-5: Protocol-2035 is redundant > http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/soapjms/tracker/issues/5 > > Issue-6: Protocol 2039 redundant > http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/soapjms/tracker/issues/6 > > Issue-7: Protocol-2041 is spurious > http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/soapjms/tracker/issues/7 > > Issue-8: Incorrect example, section C2 > http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/soapjms/tracker/issues/8 > > 7) Accepting proposals to close open issues > (depends on whether we accept any of the issues above) > > 8) FAQ - discussion > > 9) Implementations - any updates? > > 10) AOB? > > Administrative items: > * Regrets: > * Links: > * Binding spec editors draft: > http://dev.w3.org/2008/ws/soapjms/soapjms.html > * CR: > http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/CR-soapjms-20090604/ > * URI scheme > https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/draft-merrick-jms-uri/ > * FAQ: > http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/soapjms/wiki/2008-09_FAQ > > -Eric Johnson > > > -- Baroula que barouleras, au tiƩu toujou t'entourneras. ~~Yves
Received on Tuesday, 4 August 2009 11:39:51 UTC