- From: Mark Phillips <M8PHILLI@uk.ibm.com>
- Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 13:04:33 +0100
- To: public-soap-jms@w3.org
Dear all, please accept my apologies - I have a conflict today. Regards Mark From: Eric Johnson <eric@tibco.com> To: SOAP-JMS <public-soap-jms@w3.org> Date: 04/08/2009 05:46 Subject: Agenda for 2009-08-04 conference call Sent by: public-soap-jms-request@w3.org Greetings, our next call will take place on Tuesday 2009-08-04 at 16:00UTC and last for at most 1 hour. http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/meetingdetails.html?year=2009&month=08&day=04&hour=16&min=0&sec=0&p1=136&p2=179&p3=283 We will be using the Zakim bridge [1], the phone numbers and passcode for the call can be found at: http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/soapjms/admin, Participants are invited to join IRC channel #soap-jms as documented on the WG's administrative home page: http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/soapjms/admin#irc 1) Appointment of the scribe 2) Minutes Minutes of last call: http://www.w3.org/2009/07/28-soap-jms-minutes.html 3) Review the agenda 4) Review action items Actions: http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/soapjms/tracker/actions/open: 5) URI specification: Resolve IP language and resubmit - any progress? * We need to get all contributors to current version to agree to the same IP language, preferably the 200902trust. Now waiting on: * Oracle * Progress Received OK from TIBCO, Software AG, IBM Any updates? 6) Raised issues: Which of these do we want to open? http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/soapjms/tracker/issues/raised Issue-1: Protocol-2013 is spurious http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/soapjms/tracker/issues/1 Issue-2: Protocol-2020 is spurious http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/soapjms/tracker/issues/2 Issue-3: Protocol-2023 is spurious http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/soapjms/tracker/issues/3 Issue-4: Protocol-2024 needs restructuring http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/soapjms/tracker/issues/4 See proposed resolution: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-soap-jms/2009Jul/0030.html Issue-5: Protocol-2035 is redundant http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/soapjms/tracker/issues/5 Issue-6: Protocol 2039 redundant http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/soapjms/tracker/issues/6 Issue-7: Protocol-2041 is spurious http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/soapjms/tracker/issues/7 Issue-8: Incorrect example, section C2 http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/soapjms/tracker/issues/8 7) Accepting proposals to close open issues (depends on whether we accept any of the issues above) 8) FAQ - discussion 9) Implementations - any updates? 10) AOB? Administrative items: * Regrets: * Links: * Binding spec editors draft: http://dev.w3.org/2008/ws/soapjms/soapjms.html * CR: http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/CR-soapjms-20090604/ * URI scheme https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/draft-merrick-jms-uri/ * FAQ: http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/soapjms/wiki/2008-09_FAQ -Eric Johnson
Received on Tuesday, 4 August 2009 12:05:37 UTC