- From: Roland Merrick <roland_merrick@uk.ibm.com>
- Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 12:41:39 +0100
- To: public-soap-jms@w3.org
- Message-ID: <OF9C54EB89.80B82097-ON802574D7.003EB990-802574D7.004040C9@uk.ibm.com>
Greetings, our next call will take place on Tuesday 2008-10-07 at 16:00UTC and last for 1 hour. http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/meetingdetails.html?year=2008&month=10&day=07&hour=16&min=0&sec=0&p1=136&p2=179&p3=283 We will be using the Zakim bridge [1], the phone numbers and passcode for the call can be found at: http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/soapjms/admin Participants are invited to join IRC channel #soap-jms as documented on the WG's administrative home page: http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/soapjms/admin#irc Minutes of last call : http://www.w3.org/2008/09/30-soap-jms-minutes.html Oustanding Actions http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/soapjms/tracker/actions/open Agenda Regrets: none Review all open actions - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - TextMessage - how do we support it? - Phil's proposed changes to spec [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-soap-jms/2008Sep/0035.html This topic has been ongoing for a while and was agreed by those on the 2008-09-30 call. If there any concerns please send them to the mailing before this call so that they can be reviewed and allowing us to close off this topic. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Is WSDL portion of specification normative, continued? [2] - whatever the collective decision, text needs to be improved for clarity of our intent [2] - Email from Roland of 2008-09-25: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-soap-jms/2008Sep/0039.html http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-soap-jms/2008Sep/0043.html - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - URI spec, what changes do we want? - Action35 [3] Eric proposal [4] [3] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/soapjms/tracker/actions/35 [4] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-soap-jms/2008Sep/0046.html - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Specifying additional JNDI parameters, [5] & [6] - Should these JNDI items go into the URI? [7] - Do we need to worry about non-String JNDI values? Answer - don't think so. [5] - Email from Derek of 2008-09-22 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-soap-jms/2008Sep/0028.html [6] - Email from Eric of 2008-09-22 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-soap-jms/2008Sep/0031.html [7] - Email from Peter of 2008-09-22 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-soap-jms/2008Sep/0026.html - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - JMS headers, do we want to allow for setting arbitrary headers? [8] [8] - Email from Peter of 2008-09-25 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-soap-jms/2008Sep/0041.html Pubs SOAP over Java? Message Service 1.0 Editor Draft [ http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2008/ws/soapjms/soapjms.html?content-type=text/html;%20charset=utf-8 ] First Public Working Draft published [ http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/WD-soapjms-20080723/ ] Next draft: Last Call, milestone plan in Charter says Sept 2008 Regards, Roland Unless stated otherwise above: IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 741598. Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU Unless stated otherwise above: IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 741598. Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU
Received on Friday, 3 October 2008 11:42:24 UTC