RE: please respond before telecon

#1 : I am ok with handling optional features as suggested in the email referred to below.
#2 : ok with new tests.
# 3 : ok with the proposed solution for derefNV.

From: public-sml-request@w3.org [mailto:public-sml-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of John Arwe
Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2009 5:05 AM
To: public-sml@w3.org
Subject: please respond before telecon


http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-sml/2009Jan/0022.html requests feedback on several issues that we should be able to get a read on before the next telecon, under "Changes still needed"

1. Anyone not ok with solving the "optional feature" expected results by documenting two expected results, one for implementations supporting the feature and one for those not supporting it?

2. Anyone not ok with keeping the new tests (rows 144-152) that COSMOS added in response to SML's requests, and that Kumar has now run?

3. DerefNV - Anyone not ok with updating the feature description to indicate that the indicated tests count as testing it?

Best Regards, John

Street address: 2455 South Road, P328 Poughkeepsie, NY USA 12601
Voice: 1+845-435-9470      Fax: 1+845-432-9787