- From: Kumar Pandit <kumarp@windows.microsoft.com>
- Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 12:10:17 -0800
- To: Len Charest <Len.Charest@microsoft.com>, "public-sml@w3.org" <public-sml@w3.org>
Good question. It is not clear from the w3c guidelines whether we need 3 or just 1 policy doc. -----Original Message----- From: Len Charest Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2008 10:16 AM To: Kumar Pandit; public-sml@w3.org Subject: RE: namespace policy for SML/SML-IF Point of clarification: Since the specs collectively define 3 namespaces, shouldn't we provide 3 namespace documents - one per namespace? -Len From: public-sml-request@w3.org [mailto:public-sml-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Kumar Pandit Sent: Monday, November 17, 2008 10:14 PM To: public-sml@w3.org Cc: Kumar Pandit Subject: namespace policy for SML/SML-IF Here is the namespace policy for SML & SML-IF. I drafted it based on example 2 in section 4 of http://www.w3.org/2005/07/13-nsuri. Please take a look and send your feedback by eod Tuesday 11/18. We are planning to send the CR draft to the webmaster on Tue 11/18. I think we may also want to send the namespace policy document along with it. Kumar ===== SML and SML-IF Namespace Policy The SML and SML-IF specifications define the following namespaces. 1. http://www.w3.org/ns/sml 2. http://www.w3.org/ns/sml-function 3. http://www.w3.org/ns/sml-if The namespace URIs use the http://www.w3.org/ns/ssss format as recommended in section 1 of the URIs for W3C Namespaces document. Names in the namespaces listed above are defined in version 1.1 of SML and SML-IF specifications, and may also be defined in future versions of the two specifications. The specifications define language extension mechanisms and how to handle changes such as the addition of new terms to the language. W3C reserves the right to determine which changes (backward compatible or not) are in the interest of the community at large.
Received on Tuesday, 18 November 2008 20:17:36 UTC