RE: namespace policy for SML/SML-IF

Point of clarification: Since the specs collectively define 3 namespaces, shouldn't we provide 3 namespace documents - one per namespace?


From: [] On Behalf Of Kumar Pandit
Sent: Monday, November 17, 2008 10:14 PM
Cc: Kumar Pandit
Subject: namespace policy for SML/SML-IF

Here is the namespace policy for SML & SML-IF. I drafted it based on example 2 in section 4 of Please take a look and send your feedback by eod Tuesday 11/18. We are planning to send the CR draft to the webmaster on Tue 11/18. I think we may also want to send the namespace policy document along with it.



SML and SML-IF Namespace Policy

The SML and SML-IF specifications define the following namespaces.


The namespace URIs use the format as recommended in section 1 of the URIs for W3C Namespaces document.

Names in the namespaces listed above are defined in version 1.1 of SML and SML-IF specifications, and may  also be defined in future versions of the two specifications. The specifications define language extension mechanisms and how to handle changes such as the addition of new terms to the language. W3C reserves the right to determine which changes (backward compatible or not) are in the interest of the community at large.

Received on Tuesday, 18 November 2008 18:17:00 UTC