- From: Wilson, Kirk D <Kirk.Wilson@ca.com>
- Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2007 20:18:08 -0400
- To: "Smith, Virginia \(HP Software\)" <virginia.smith@hp.com>, <public-sml@w3.org>
I believe the Action items fall into three categories: (1) Actions to open Bugzilla issues, (2) Editorial actions, and (3) Others, miscellaneous actions perhaps directed at a particular person. Does the current proposal address only group (2) or is it intended to address (2) and (3) thereby requiring that every action eventually show up in Bugzilla? Also, is the expected procedure that the scribe will regard an action item with [EDITORS], as demonstrated in Sandy's latest minutes, and the Editors will take the action of entering the issue into Bugzilla? Kirk Wilson, Ph.D. Architect, Development CA Labs / IP&S 603 823-7146 -----Original Message----- From: public-sml-request@w3.org [mailto:public-sml-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Smith, Virginia (HP Software) Sent: Friday, June 22, 2007 5:40 PM To: public-sml@w3.org Subject: Tracking editor action items The SML editor team would like to track all our action items in Bugzilla for the following reasons: - We would like to keep all issues in one place rather than having both bugs and action items. - Bugzilla is easier for tracking since we can reassign owners and keep track of status and priority in Bugzilla. This means that the editors will move all (past and future) editor action items into Bugzilla. The intent of this email is just to verify with the working group that this process is ok. Does anyone have any problems with this? -- ginny
Received on Sunday, 24 June 2007 00:18:12 UTC