- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 16:37:12 +0000
- To: public-sml@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4643 Summary: inheritance of identity constraints through substitution - align with XSD? Product: SML Version: unspecified Platform: Macintosh OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: Core AssignedTo: cmsmcq@w3.org ReportedBy: cmsmcq@w3.org QAContact: public-sml@w3.org In section 3.5, the draft spec says If an SML identity constraint is specified for an element declaration E, then this constraint is applicable to all instances of E in a model, i.e., the identity constraint MUST be satisfied for each instance of E in a valid model XSD 1.0 does not impose any analogous constraint on identity constraints within single documents. Should we align with XSD by removing this constraint? Should we align with XSD by persuading the XML Schema Working Group to impose an analogous constraint in XSD? Or should we decide that on this point we believe alignment with XSD is not desirable or necessary? Some thinking and research will be needed, and discussion with the Schema WG.
Received on Wednesday, 13 June 2007 16:37:13 UTC