- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 16:37:12 +0000
- To: public-sml@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4643
Summary: inheritance of identity constraints through substitution
- align with XSD?
Product: SML
Version: unspecified
Platform: Macintosh
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: Core
AssignedTo: cmsmcq@w3.org
ReportedBy: cmsmcq@w3.org
QAContact: public-sml@w3.org
In section 3.5, the draft spec says
If an SML identity constraint is specified for an element
declaration E, then this constraint is applicable to all
instances of E in a model, i.e., the identity constraint
MUST be satisfied for each instance of E in a valid model
XSD 1.0 does not impose any analogous constraint on identity
constraints within single documents.
Should we align with XSD by removing this constraint?
Should we align with XSD by persuading the XML Schema Working
Group to impose an analogous constraint in XSD?
Or should we decide that on this point we believe alignment
with XSD is not desirable or necessary?
Some thinking and research will be needed, and discussion with
the Schema WG.
Received on Wednesday, 13 June 2007 16:37:13 UTC