Re: [Conformance] Thoughts/ edits on the Use Cases Document

Hi team,

I would like your opinion about if data that is updated at a fast pace
(such as cryptocurrency apps) would be part of the Use Cases.

Thanks,
Regards,


El vie, 13 may 2022 a las 15:59, Bruce Bailey (<Bailey@access-board.gov>)
escribió:

> We had a similar issue/concern for “raw data” with the Revised 508
> Standards.  Jeanne, can you suggest a wiki or GitHub page where I might
> share/memorialize some of that experience?
>
>
>
> The issue comes up in Technical Assistance in that if the business need
> is, for example, an mpeg file format – that does not include captioning.
> For federal agencies under 508, we point to the allowance for “fundamental
> alteration”:
>
> https://www.access-board.gov/ict/#E202.6
>
>
>
> As Andy notes, any prepared product would need captioning.  Drawing the
> line for public facing raw data gets pretty tricky pretty fast.  Is the
> agency really only posting B-roll stuff?  If it worth sharing, why is not
> also worth providing some kind of timed-text file?  During the 508 public
> comment period, there were conversations about exceptions for “drafts” and
> “works in progress” and the Access Board ultimately came to the conclusion
> that would have been too much of a loophole.
>
>
>
> Still there are a couple of additional notable caveats related to the
> limits of file formats:
>
>
>
> https://www.access-board.gov/ict/#504.1 Authoring Tools, General
>
> …to the extent that information required for accessibility is supported by
> the destination format.
>
>
>
> https://www.access-board.gov/ict/#504.2 Content Creation or Editing
>
> …to file formats supported by the authoring tool.
>
> --
> Bruce Bailey (he/him)
> Accessibility IT Specialist
> U.S. Access Board
> 1331 F Street NW, Suite 1000
> Washington, DC  20004-1111
> 202-760-1947 (mobile)
> bailey@access-board.gov
>
> Thank you for your questions concerning section 508 of the Rehabilitation
> Act Amendments of 1998.  Section 508 authorizes the Access Board to provide
> technical assistance to individuals and Federal departments and agencies
> concerning the requirements of this section.  Technical assistance provided
> in this email is intended solely as informal guidance; it is neither a
> determination of your legal rights or responsibilities, nor a statement of
> the official views of the U.S. Access Board or any other federal agency.
> Any links to non-federal websites are provided as a courtesy and do not
> represent an endorsement of the linked information, products, or services.
>
>
>
> *From:* Andrew Somers <andy@generaltitles.com>
> *Sent:* Thursday, May 12, 2022 6:15 PM
> *To:* Gregg Vanderheiden <gregg@raisingthefloor.org>
> *Cc:* Silver TF <public-silver@w3.org>; Jeanne Spellman <
> jspellman@spellmanconsulting.com>
> *Subject:* Re: [Conformance] Thoughts/ edits on the Use Cases Document
>
>
>
> Hi Gregg, this is good and examines a useful array of use cases and
> exceptions/qualifiers.
>
>
>
> *A potential “raw data” exception:*
>
>
>
> Something I mentioned in a related thread some months ago, relates to
> “original data” for example:
>
>
>
> Camera original .mov, .avi or similar movie files are often important to
> be kept as-is and unaltered, for evidentiary purposes for example.
> Embedding things like caption data (into the file) typically results in the
> file being re-compressed, which results in data loss. As such, a reasonable
> exception to the captioning requirement relates to camera original files
> which reasonably need to be left in their unaltered form.
>
>
>
> Caption files can be created as sidecars, of course—and naturally, a
> separate version of the video file can be created to make captions
> available, but consider a site such as WikiLeaks, where information that is
> socially/politically important is held for dissemination. It is better that
> a site be able to hold a mass of such data than to be prohibited from doing
> so due to a compliance issue. And when possible, evidentiary data is best
> held/provided in an unaltered form.
>
>
>
> Naturally, a commercial news operation should not be able to use such an
> exception when it comes to their *prepared* newscasts, but even a
> commercial news operation should be able to provide raw/unaltered footage
> as a separately available file, and “raw” files can not reasonably be
> required to be altered.
>
>
>
> As such, this points to needed exception language for raw, original, and
> archival materials.
>
>
>
>
>
> Andy
>
>
>
> *   Andrew Somers *
>
> Senior Color Science Researcher
>
> *PerceptEx Perception Research Project*
> <https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.myndex.com%2Fperceptex%2F&data=05%7C01%7Cbailey%40access-board.gov%7C24429574ac5d463f070508da34652ca7%7Cfc6093f5e55e4f93b2cf26d0822201c9%7C0%7C1%7C637879906410328795%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=wlSXdOP6u%2Fo9%2FSjFGaBqCy%2BL1S5dKuJS6ZCz98g8lyA%3D&reserved=0>
>
>
> <https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.myndex.com%2Fperceptex%2F&data=05%7C01%7Cbailey%40access-board.gov%7C24429574ac5d463f070508da34652ca7%7Cfc6093f5e55e4f93b2cf26d0822201c9%7C0%7C1%7C637879906410328795%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=wlSXdOP6u%2Fo9%2FSjFGaBqCy%2BL1S5dKuJS6ZCz98g8lyA%3D&reserved=0>
>
>
>
> On May 12, 2022, at 1:54 PM, Gregg Vanderheiden <gregg@raisingthefloor.org>
> wrote:
>
>
>
> This is a work in progress —
>
>
>
> I’m posting it for review and feedback as I go
>
>
>
> <Use Cases for WCAG 3.0 Conformance.docx>
>
>
>
> gregg
>
> ———————————
> Professor, University of Maryland, College Park
> Founder and Director Emeritus , Trace R&D Center, UMD
>
> Co-Founder Raising the Floor. http://raisingthefloor.org
> <https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fraisingthefloor.org%2F&data=05%7C01%7Cbailey%40access-board.gov%7C24429574ac5d463f070508da34652ca7%7Cfc6093f5e55e4f93b2cf26d0822201c9%7C0%7C1%7C637879906410328795%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=d8xWC1QMPOAjUXxeWOPS1J9dQGRVeQr9ZamSWBF%2FDbs%3D&reserved=0>
> The Global Public Inclusive Infrastructure (GPII) http://GPII.net
> <https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fgpii.net%2F&data=05%7C01%7Cbailey%40access-board.gov%7C24429574ac5d463f070508da34652ca7%7Cfc6093f5e55e4f93b2cf26d0822201c9%7C0%7C1%7C637879906410328795%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=Pub5KexK8zMA7BTH%2Bds5qMMEhBy2kUPTlF%2B%2FepUu6%2Bo%3D&reserved=0>
> The Morphic project  https://morphic.org
> <https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fmorphic.org%2F&data=05%7C01%7Cbailey%40access-board.gov%7C24429574ac5d463f070508da34652ca7%7Cfc6093f5e55e4f93b2cf26d0822201c9%7C0%7C1%7C637879906410328795%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=5ZWWF56xiDN%2B%2BCRw3N5t5NVh08ht0z7t38d6nuKV1yY%3D&reserved=0>
>
>
>
>
>