Re: [Accessibiity Support] Minutes of the meeting of 26 July 2022 (Week 2)

 I added comments about accessibility supported to the google doc, so that might have been me.  I also provided the example from www.powermapper.com, which shows a group determining which web content techniques actually are compatible with browser and AT combinations.

Mark Weiler


    On Tuesday, July 26, 2022 at 10:43:03 a.m. EDT, Makoto Ueki <makoto.ueki@gmail.com> wrote:  
 
    
   - Present: AWK, Makoto   
Regrets: Bruce, Poornima   
   
Summary   
* Partipnats were just two this week. We might need more participants.   
* Two of us discussed our goal and steps and agreed with the following:   
  - Our goal is to present pros and cons on 1) Keeping "Accessibility Supported" and 2) NOT keeping "Accessibility Supported" for WCAG 3.   
  - STEP 1. Gather and document use cases on "Accessibility Supported", including Japan, Adobe, Section 508, and other cases if any.   
  - STEP 2. Document pros and cons on 1) and 2) above and consider which we'll recommend.   
  - STEP 3. Present "What form it will take if we'll take option 1) ("Keeping").   
* We've got some comments from "Anonymous" for our starting document. We'd like to know who they are if possbile.   

   - https://docs.google.com/document/d/1XxzwsgWZSDh2EDqTag-nYfrqAT3b6Glpu8DGbVpTd9M/
Minutes:
https://www.w3.org/2022/07/26-wcag3-supported-minutes.html


Cheers,
Makoto