W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-silver@w3.org > March 2021

Ideas for responding to issues [was agenda]

From: Jeanne Spellman <jspellman@spellmanconsulting.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2021 12:20:54 -0500
To: public-silver@w3.org
Message-ID: <c0188520-8dd0-3e0e-b75b-f71bd7726d67@spellmanconsulting.com>
Thank you, Bruce.  This is good advice.  I adapted it and posted your 
ideas on the Procedures for Comment Processing 
<https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/task-forces/silver/wiki/Procedure_for_Processing_Comments#Responding_to_Issues> 
page.  Personally, I appreciate the guidance and the years of experience 
behind it for the issues I am responding to.

jeanne

On 3/2/2021 10:07 AM, Bruce Bailey wrote:
>
> Responses to Use
>
>   * Thank the poster for participating/contributing.
>   * Ask a clarifying question.
>   * Alert the participant to any of the live public forums that will
>     be relevant to their comments.
>   * If appropriate, provide excerpts from the Access Board’s published
>     material, such as regulations and technical assistance documents
>     (but not commentary as to any potential future application of
>     these provisions outside of their current application and scoping).
>
> Responses to Avoid
>
>   * Any value judgement on the content of  the post.  (Like “Good
>     point! or “That wouldn’t work.”)
>   * Agreeing or disagreeing with any ideas.
>   * Comments indicating that we will or won’t consider something.
>   * Suggestions about any future actions the Access Board will take.
>
Received on Tuesday, 9 March 2021 17:21:09 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Tuesday, 9 March 2021 17:21:09 UTC