- From: Laura Carlson <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2021 09:56:05 -0500
- To: David MacDonald <david@can-adapt.com>
- Cc: Wilco Fiers <wilco.fiers@deque.com>, "Sajka, Janina" <sajkaj@amazon.com>, Silver Task Force <public-silver@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAOavpveJ+-GPMKr1EcdrJrGPrnK0UZXPjUCBTFo3ZbdLNZXMdg@mail.gmail.com>
+1 On Fri, Jun 11, 2021, 9:33 AM David MacDonald <david@can-adapt.com> wrote: > In my experience with multinations, they have a chunks of their > functionally provided 3rd party content and these large corporations have a > lot of influence over 3rd parties… as a result I’ve worked with many 3rd > party providers who were trying to meet conformance in the context of the > larger sitr where they were hosted. > > If the web site is off the hook for 3rd party content… the 3rd party is > likely not accountable to anyone because its hard to know who they are or > where they are… and the web site is still inaccessible. > > It might also motivate companies to farm out large portions of their site > to 3rd parties… > > Also, there may be a blurry line between 3rd party content and content > that was coded by a third party, such as an agency? > > I would be shy to exempt 3rd party content. > > On Fri, Jun 11, 2021 at 7:22 AM Wilco Fiers <wilco.fiers@deque.com> wrote: > >> Hey folks, >> After mulling it over some more, I wanted to reiterate that I am >> uncomfortable with the current proposal, and that I don't think this is >> ready to be added to a WCAG 3 draft just yet. As I indicated yesterday >> during the call, I think creating a blanket exception for all third-party >> content is problematic. Creating transparency about where the inaccessible >> content is, and who is responsible for it is a good step in the right >> direction. But I don't think doing just those two things absolves an >> organisation from their responsibility of ensuring their software >> isn't disabling their users. >> >> I would ask that we continue to work on this. I don't think we've fully >> explored the options for third-party conformance yet. >> >> Kind regards, >> >> >> On Wed, Jun 9, 2021 at 9:01 PM Sajka, Janina <sajkaj@amazon.com> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> Colleagues: >>> >>> >>> >>> The Silver Conformance Options Subgroup will meet again this Thursday 10 >>> >>> June at 12:00 PM (Noon) Boston Time (1600 UTC). You can confirm the >>> correct time of this meeting in your local time zone using this link: >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> https://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?msg=Silver+Substantial+Conformance+Subgroup&iso=20210611T12&p1=43 >>> >>> >>> >>> Zoom teleconference data is provided at this link: >>> >>> >>> >>> https://www.w3.org/2017/08/telecon-info_silver-conf >>> >>> >>> >>> As always, we'll be on IRC using the W3C server at irc.w3.org, in >>> channel #silver-conf. >>> >>> >>> >>> These and additional details of our work, including minutes and current >>> draft documents are available on our subgroup wiki page here: >>> >>> >>> >>> https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/task-forces/silver/wiki/Substantial_Conformance >>> >>> >>> >>> *** Proposed Agenda *** >>> >>> >>> >>> Agenda+ Agenda Review & Administrative Items >>> >>> agenda+ Third Party Proposal >>> https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/task-forces/silver/wiki/Proposal_on_Third_Party_Content >>> >>> agenda+ Whoville as Proxy for Views & Processes >>> https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/task-forces/silver/wiki/May_Report_to_the_Silver_TF#Principle_3:_Scoping_for_Primary_Purpose >>> >>> agenda+ Other Business >>> >>> agenda+ Be Done >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> ***Key Links*** >>> >>> >>> >>> (Draft) Proposal on Third Party Content >>> >>> >>> https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/task-forces/silver/wiki/Proposal_on_Third_Party_Content >>> >>> >>> >>> May Report: >>> >>> >>> https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/task-forces/silver/wiki/May_Report_to_the_Silver_TF >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> ---------------------------------- >>> >>> >>> >>> Janina Sajka >>> >>> Accessibility Standards Consultant >>> >>> sajkaj@amazon.com >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> *Wilco Fiers* >> Axe-core product owner - Facilitator ACT Task Force - Co-chair ACT-Rules >> >> >> -- > Cheers, > David MacDonald > > > > *Can**Adapt* *Solutions Inc.* > Mobile: 613.806.9005 > > LinkedIn > <http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmacdonald100> > > twitter.com/davidmacd > > GitHub <https://github.com/DavidMacDonald> > > www.Can-Adapt.com <http://www.can-adapt.com/> > > > > * Adapting the web to all users* > * Including those with disabilities* > > If you are not the intended recipient, please review our privacy policy > <http://www.davidmacd.com/disclaimer.html> >
Received on Friday, 11 June 2021 14:56:50 UTC