W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-silver@w3.org > August 2020

Follow-up from the meeting

From: Jeanne Spellman <jspellman@spellmanconsulting.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2020 16:21:32 -0400
To: Silver Task Force <public-silver@w3.org>
Message-ID: <7b602cc2-b800-8420-fe96-d43b2d315bab@spellmanconsulting.com>
At the end of the meeting I asked that people please make time to review 
and comment on these drafts before we send them for plain language review:

  * Images of Text
    <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1h5IiwbIvsWZr8N2qXNm9NQBR46gQWmfvWpDvtxHxR9o/edit#heading=h.eyftmriw7ts1>
    (discussed in the meeting)
  * Methods for Content Structure
    <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Ya8LB2YL0qRHdFEHIQoXG8rfaR8fdUpcO79ceMiGLQs/>
    (started but not completed)
  * Use Clear Words
    <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1p-FayvZYonpDIlojblFSofi_KzjNdY5SrBOKauvV0u8/>

Key points to look for: The Functional Outcomes, the Scoring, 
particularly the critical errors and the rating.

For those not at the meeting: These are drafts of the new format of 
Methods. This new format reflects the changes agreed on from the merged 
Conformance draft last week.  The Functional Outcomes are more granular 
than success criteria. Each should have tests and how the Method should 
be tested and scored.

Please comment as a suggestion in the document or in a separate email to 
the list.
Received on Friday, 21 August 2020 20:21:48 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 20:31:49 UTC