Follow-up from the meeting

At the end of the meeting I asked that people please make time to review 
and comment on these drafts before we send them for plain language review:

  * Images of Text
    <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1h5IiwbIvsWZr8N2qXNm9NQBR46gQWmfvWpDvtxHxR9o/edit#heading=h.eyftmriw7ts1>
    (discussed in the meeting)
  * Methods for Content Structure
    <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Ya8LB2YL0qRHdFEHIQoXG8rfaR8fdUpcO79ceMiGLQs/>
    (started but not completed)
  * Use Clear Words
    <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1p-FayvZYonpDIlojblFSofi_KzjNdY5SrBOKauvV0u8/>

Key points to look for: The Functional Outcomes, the Scoring, 
particularly the critical errors and the rating.

For those not at the meeting: These are drafts of the new format of 
Methods. This new format reflects the changes agreed on from the merged 
Conformance draft last week.  The Functional Outcomes are more granular 
than success criteria. Each should have tests and how the Method should 
be tested and scored.

Please comment as a suggestion in the document or in a separate email to 
the list.