> I also was under the presumption that we were moving from a "per-page" conformance model to a "site-wide" conformance "score". I’m not sure about that, but I thought there was a move from page to task. Given a move from page to task: Should the standard be defining coverage? Or would it be better to make the same sort of assumptions as 2.x and leave it to regulators to say whether a site should cover all tasks, or what the sampling is? -AlastairReceived on Tuesday, 28 April 2020 13:42:20 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 20:31:47 UTC