W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-silver@w3.org > April 2020

RE: Task testing structure

From: Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2020 13:17:11 +0000
To: John Foliot <john.foliot@deque.com>
CC: WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>, Silver TF <public-silver@w3.org>
Message-ID: <AM7PR09MB41678275B767588D1832B428B9AC0@AM7PR09MB4167.eurprd09.prod.outlook.com>
Hi John,

Could you clarify how that is different from the current situation?

For example, the 2.x conformance model allows the conformer to specify what is in/out of scope based on web pages. Processes need to be dealt with as a unit, but according to the spec, you choose URIs to conform.

As we all know, in practice laws (at least in the UK/EU) assume all pages (or don’t specify), and we come to some sort of sampling method, to get coverage and provide some confidence across larger sites.

My point is: Should the standard be defining coverage? Or would it be better to make the same sort of assumptions as 2.x and leave it to regulators to say whether a site should cover all tasks, or what the sampling is?


Received on Tuesday, 28 April 2020 13:17:27 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 20:31:47 UTC