W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-silver@w3.org > March 2018

Re: Problem Statements For Design Sprint

From: Hall, Charles (DET-MRM) <Charles.Hall@mrm-mccann.com>
Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2018 22:30:01 +0000
To: mark tanner <mktanner@btinternet.com>, "public-silver@w3.org" <public-silver@w3.org>
Message-ID: <0AE1CF26-2C95-4F28-BEA8-5F0B0733580D@mrm-mccann.com>
Hi Mark,

Thank you for feedback. The document is still being edited in preparation to post a final version for the Design Sprint.
I resolved the order. Some of the copy is in flux with pending comments.

Thanks,


Charles Hall
UX Architect, Technology

t / 248.203.8723  m / 248.225.8179
e / charles.hall@mrm-mccann.com
skype / charles.h.all
360 W Maple, Birmingham MI 48009
w / www.mrm-mccann.com

[cid:image001.png@01D3B3DE.6F5F6230]
Creativity. Technology. Performance.

From: mark tanner <mktanner@btinternet.com>
Date: Sunday, March 4, 2018 at 7:16 AM
To: Silver Task Force <public-silver@w3.org>
Subject: Problem Statements For Design Sprint
Resent-From: Silver Task Force <public-silver@w3.org>
Resent-Date: Sunday, March 4, 2018 at 7:22 AM


Charles,
In several instances, in Usability and Conformance model, the content headings don’t correspond to the headings in the outline at the top of the document. Most just require a change in the ordering or numbering to fix.
However in Conformance Model there is a whole section “monitoring process” which is listed in the outline, but has no content. There is also a section “Evolving technology” which has content, but is not listed in the outline.
The maintenance section is fine, with the numbering and headings in both outline and content matching.
I have listed the mismatches below. Numbers and headings in brackets are the numbering and headings in the main body of the content.
Outline.

  1.  Usability
     *   Themes from research.  (Matches)
     *   Too difficult to read. (1.2 Difficult to Get Started)
     *   Difficult to get started (1.3 Ambiguity in interpreting success criteria)
     *   Ambiguity in interpreting the success criteria (1.4 Convincing others)
     *   Convincing Others (1.5 Too Difficult to read)
  2.  Conformance Model

     *   Themes from research (Matches)
     *   Constraints on What is Strictly Testable (2.2 Evolving technology)
     *   Human Testable (Matches)
     *   Accessibility Supported (Matches)
     *   Monitoring process (2.5 Constraints on what is strictly testable)

Mark
This message contains information which may be confidential and privileged. Unless you are the intended recipient (or authorized to receive this message for the intended recipient), you may not use, copy, disseminate or disclose to anyone the message or any information contained in the message.  If you have received the message in error, please advise the sender by reply e-mail, and delete the message.  Thank you very much.

image001.png
(image/png attachment: image001.png)

Received on Sunday, 4 March 2018 22:30:41 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:23:52 UTC