Minutes from the Silver meeting of 20 July

Formatted minutes:

Text of minutes:


       [1] http://www.w3.org/

                                - DRAFT -

                  Silver Community Group Teleconference

20 Jul 2018


           jeanne, KimD, Charles, shari, JemmaKu, LuisG, kirkwood,
           kimpatch, AngelaAccessForAll

           Shawn, Jennison




      * [2]Topics
          1. [3]TPAC reminder - early bird registration fee ends 31
          2. [4]socialize the invitation to submit prototypes
          3. [5]Updated Flavours of Silver prototype and IA doc
             from MIkeCrabb
          4. [6]Feedback from AGWG on Silver Requirements
          5. [7]Silver Basics explanation doc
          6. [8]new Plain language responses from the CG list
      * [9]Summary of Action Items
      * [10]Summary of Resolutions

    <Charles> I finally registered for TPAC. See you there!

    agenda item 1: TPAC registration early bird is due by the 31st

    <Charles> Mon–Wed

TPAC reminder - early bird registration fee ends 31 July

    We need people to register if even you can't pay yet. Otherwise
    we may have to give up our room if we don't have enough people

    <jeanne> Instructions for registration -

      [11] https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-silver/2018Jun/0036.html

    <Charles> Including Jeanne and Shawn, the Silver CG is now 107
    people, so hopefully more than 3 or 4 of us are going.

socialize the invitation to submit prototypes


      [12] https://www.w3.org/community/silver/2018/07/19/invitation-contribute-ideas-to-silver/

    <Charles> I have socialized this on the web-a11y.slack.com
    Slack team

    please feel free to send this out and/or socialize it. Jeanne
    will tweet it out after today's meeting.


      [13] https://mikecrabb.github.io/silver_flavor_prototype/

Updated Flavours of Silver prototype and IA doc from MIkeCrabb


      [14] https://github.com/w3c/silver/tree/master/prototypes/FlavorPrototype


      [15] https://mikecrabb.github.io/silver_flavor_prototype/

    <jemma> jemma: I wonder about "development" category - It seem
    to me that "ARIA" does not belong there.

    On Tuesday be reviewing more plain language information. Jeanne
    and Angela are looking at putting together a document with
    plain language examples that can be used for the prototypes.

    <jemma> ARIA is technique, not technology specific like pdf or

    <jemma> I create the issue as I was told.

      [16] https://github.com/w3c/silver/issues/27

    <jemma> scribe: shari

    it may be a good idea to show people that plain language
    options as a way to get some user data.

    @jemma- sure

    we also need to start including some of the measurements in the

    in mike's prototype, jeanne would like to add another section
    for evaluation and have links to various measures, etc

    <Charles> what if the plain language prototypes were in GitHub?
    this way they are closer to being ready for testing, as well as
    available to copy/paste.

    <jemma> I like Jeanne's idea adding "testing" menu under the

    the above document was created by mike. he drew up the current
    structure and also presented a potential new structure

    he suggested 3 different types of tagging. it could be sorted
    by role or by project stage.

    <Charles> the current structure diagram should match this:

      [17] https://docs.google.com/document/d/1GniLcfhw1M37UkgBsewDfVWc3QlE741HzC3xpnryRjQ/edit?usp=sharing

    please take the time to read through it and make comments

    <kirkwood> Yes it does. You can go back in history

    <kirkwood> Can change from editing to suggestions. and then
    others can accept. very powerful

    <kirkwood> I think its important to be able to suggest

    jeanne will talk with mike about changes the permissions on the
    document so that it restricts editing/commenting

    <KimD> *thanks, John!

Feedback from AGWG on Silver Requirements

    AGWG meeting- positive responses from the group about the
    direction silver is taking

    <Charles> was there discussion on or a decision reached within
    the WG on a charter for 2.2?

    no there was not a discussion or decision on 2.2

    correction--there was discussion but no decision

    <jeanne> List of WCAG 2.1 SC deferred to Silver

      [18] https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1XShLFX8fxHYYLn8A6avDwu37w9JfnZCGWvAKBpK9Xo4/edit#gid=264773938

    this is the list of wcag 2.1 success critieria that were
    deferred to silver. it also provides the reasons why it was was

    <jemma> thanks!

Silver Basics explanation doc

    <jeanne> Jeanne: KimD and I are working on an introductory
    document for new people and we will have something to show the
    group on Tuesday.

new Plain language responses from the CG list

    <jeanne> jeanne: There are new Plain Language responses and we
    will be talking about them on Tuesday.

Received on Friday, 20 July 2018 19:08:48 UTC