- From: Jeanne Spellman <jspellman@spellmanconsulting.com>
- Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2021 11:04:25 -0500
- To: public-silver-editors@w3.org
Got it. There are a few "we are working on it" that got into the list. I'll stop. I am not closing any of these right now, because it was decided I shouldn't. We need to have a more nuanced conversation about what we can close. There are things that shouldn't need to go to survey or the working group. I suspect we let participants bully us into a more cumbersome process than we really need. On 3/10/2021 9:36 AM, Michael Cooper wrote: > > Just to clarify my response, I was talking about the final issue > disposition, that needs to be copied to the comments list on which the > original comment was filed. The preliminary "we're working on it" > response does not need to be copied though, that's just admin. Michael > > On 09/03/2021 1:57 p.m., Michael Cooper wrote: >> On 09/03/2021 1:46 p.m., Jeanne Spellman wrote: >>> Hi Michael, >>> >>> I'm working on moving the emails into Github and I have questions. >>> >>> 1) Should we include the email address of the commenter into GH? At >>> first I thought it would be convenient, but then I wondered about >>> privacy and how widely we expose email addresses. Thoughts? >> There should be a pointer to the comment in the list archives, which >> will have the person's email. Therefore, there is no need to copy it >> to the github issue, and I recommend against it. >>> >>> 2) Should my answer be copied to the public AGWG comments list or >>> just to the person who made the comments? I didn't want to clutter >>> the list archives with a lot of comments, but maybe we need a copy >>> of them? >> >> Definitely copy the list for issues that were filed via the list. We >> need a public record of responses traceable from the original message. >> >> For comments originally filed in GitHub, just the response in the >> issue is sufficient, no need to copy comments lists on those as the >> list archives wouldn't have context anyways. >> >> Michael >> >>> >>> >>> I've done a few now including one that had to be split up. I think >>> that's my questions for now. :) >>> >>> jeanne >>> >>>
Received on Wednesday, 10 March 2021 16:04:38 UTC