Re: Need review today: Please review Silver acknowledgements

Add to D.1 Participants of the Silver Task Force and Community Group...

Omar Bonilla

Joe Cronin

Mary Jo Mueller

Sheri Byrne-Haber

Lucy Greco

Christy Owens

Kimberly Patch

Christian Perera

Abi Roper

Karen Schriver

Stein Erik Skotkjerra

David Swallow

Suzanne Taylor

Please keep the Research Partners as from D.3 of Requirements (it's what 
you have in the branch).

On 10/27/2020 2:10 PM, Michael Cooper wrote:
>
> BTW, lists of participants that you might want to check for missing 
> names that you know of:
>
> Silver CG: https://www.w3.org/groups/cg/silver/participants
>
> Silver TF: https://www.w3.org/groups/tf/silver-tf
>
> AG WG: https://www.w3.org/groups/wg/ag/participants
>
> Michael
>
> On 27/10/2020 1:59 p.m., Michael Cooper wrote:
>>
>> It turns out we (I) overlooked putting the acknowledgements section 
>> into the WCAG 3 draft. I've taken a stab:
>>
>> https://raw.githack.com/w3c/silver/acknowledgements/guidelines/index.html#acknowledgements
>>
>> I used my judgement about people who have contributed, but almost 
>> certainly missed people. Please let me know whom to add.
>>
>> I combined Silver CG and Silver TF because they operate as a unit. 
>> Normally I include company names alongside the individual, but things 
>> were all over the map and I couldn't get something consistent, so I 
>> just omitted that.
>>
>> I drew in part from an early draft:
>>
>> https://github.com/w3c/silver/blob/8809343c30a291bdac05d67a419fc65c0c785af3/edDraft/index.html
>>
>> From that, I also pulled in the "research partners" list. I didn't 
>> include the Design Sprint because I don't think that rises to the 
>> level of a spec acknowledgement - though perhaps those names should 
>> be credited as CG participants. I'm not sure either about the 
>> research partners, whether it rises to the level of belonging there, 
>> I'd like input on that.
>>
>> Michael
>>

Received on Tuesday, 27 October 2020 21:53:40 UTC