- From: Jeanne Spellman <jspellman@spellmanconsulting.com>
- Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2020 16:03:43 -0400
- To: public-silver-editors@w3.org
Please do put in the research partners. It was part of our agreement with them that they would get acknowledgement in the FPWD. I'm going to start going through the names now. On 10/27/2020 1:59 PM, Michael Cooper wrote: > > It turns out we (I) overlooked putting the acknowledgements section > into the WCAG 3 draft. I've taken a stab: > > https://raw.githack.com/w3c/silver/acknowledgements/guidelines/index.html#acknowledgements > > I used my judgement about people who have contributed, but almost > certainly missed people. Please let me know whom to add. > > I combined Silver CG and Silver TF because they operate as a unit. > Normally I include company names alongside the individual, but things > were all over the map and I couldn't get something consistent, so I > just omitted that. > > I drew in part from an early draft: > > https://github.com/w3c/silver/blob/8809343c30a291bdac05d67a419fc65c0c785af3/edDraft/index.html > > From that, I also pulled in the "research partners" list. I didn't > include the Design Sprint because I don't think that rises to the > level of a spec acknowledgement - though perhaps those names should be > credited as CG participants. I'm not sure either about the research > partners, whether it rises to the level of belonging there, I'd like > input on that. > > Michael >
Received on Tuesday, 27 October 2020 20:03:56 UTC